Magnifying Glass Human Head Faces Psychology

Universalism

What Is Universalism?

Universalism is the philosophical and theological concept that some ideas have universal application or applicability. A community that calls itself universalist may emphasize the universal principles of most religions, and accept others in an inclusive manner. It is centered on the belief in a universal reconciliation between humanity and the divine.

A belief in one fundamental truth is another important tenet in Universalism. The living truth is seen as more far-reaching than the national, cultural, or religious boundaries or interpretations of that one truth. As the Rig Veda states, “Truth is one; sages call it by various names.”[1]

Universalism has had an influence on modern day Hinduism, in turn influencing western modern spirituality.[2]

Christian universalism is focused on the idea of universal reconciliation. Also known as universal salvation, it is a doctrine stating that every human soul will ultimately be reconciled to God because of divine love and mercy.[3]

Unitarian Universalism emphasizes that religion is a universal human quality, and also focuses on the universal principles of most religions. It accepts all religions in an inclusive manner.

Magnifying Glass Human Head Faces PsychologyPhilosophy

Universality

In analytic philosophy, universality is the idea that universal facts exist and can be progressively discovered, as opposed to relativism. In certain theologies, universalism is the quality ascribed to an entity whose existence is consistent throughout the universe, whose being is independent of and unconstrained by the events and conditions that compose the universe, such as entropy and physical locality.

This article also discusses Kantian and Platonist notions of “universal”, which are considered by most philosophers to be separate notions.

Patristic Universalism

A view held by Early Church Fathers and still held today by the Eastern Orthodox Church. This view was advocated by St Clement of Alexandria, Origen of Alexandria and other Eastern Church Fathers.A type of ‘Universalism’ is held by those in Judaism. More information about the Patristic Era, and Theological view point can be find in various books, encyclopedias, and Church History

Moral universalism

Moral universalism (moral objectivism or universal morality) is the meta-ethical position that some system of ethics applies universally. That system is inclusive of all individuals,[5] regardless of culture, race, sex, religion, nationality, sexual orientation, or any other distinguishing feature.[6] Moral universalism is opposed to moral nihilism and moral relativism. However, not all forms of moral universalism are absolutist, nor do they necessarily value monism. Many forms of universalism, such as utilitarianism, are non-absolutist. Other forms such as those theorized by Isaiah Berlin, may value pluralist ideals.

Moral particularism is an applied ethics view that there are no moral principles and that moral judgement is determined by relevant factors in a particular context. This stands in stark contrast to other prominent moral theories, such as deontology or utilitarianism. Deontology states that people have a set of duties (that are to be considered or respected); utilitarianism states that people are to respect the happiness or the preferences of others in their actions.

Secular universalism

Universalism is not only a set of values, but a worldview to which any can subscribe if they observe and believe in the universality of the human experience—and that of all sentient life—and work to uphold the principles, ethics, and actions that safeguard these fundamental things.[7]

Indeed, many Universalists may be attracted to the logic of universally applicable principles, rather than any belief or dogma. Human unity, solidarity, and the perceived need for a sustainable and socially conscious global order are among the tendencies of non-religious Universalist thought.[8]

Religion

Christianity

The fundamental idea of Christian Universalism is universal reconciliation – that all humans will eventually be saved. They will eventually enter God’s kingdom in Heaven, through the grace and works of the lord Jesus Christ.[14] Christian Universalism teaches that an eternal Hell does not exist, and that it was not what Jesus had taught. They point to historical evidence showing that some early fathers of the church were universalists, and attribute the perpetuating idea of hell to eternal mistranslation.[15]

Universalists cite numerous Biblical passages which reference the salvation of all beings.[16] In addition, they argue that an eternal hell is both unjust, and against the nature and attributes of a loving God.[17]

The remaining beliefs of Christian Universalism are generally compatible with the fundamentals of Christianity

  • God is the loving Parent of all peoples, see Love of God.
  • Jesus Christ reveals the nature and character of God, and is the spiritual leader of humankind.
  • Humankind is created with an immortal soul, which death can not end—or a mortal soul that shall be resurrected and preserved by God. A soul which God will not wholly destroy.[18]
  • Sin has negative consequences for the sinner either in this life or the afterlife. All of God’s punishments for sin are corrective and remedial. None of such punishments will last forever, or result in the permanent destruction of a soul. Some Christian Universalists believe in the idea of a Purgatorial Hell, or a temporary place of purification that some must undergo before their entrance into Heaven.[19]

In 1899 the Universalist General Convention, later called the Universalist Church of America, adopted the Five Principles: the belief in God, Jesus Christ, the immortality of the human soul, the reality of sin and universal reconciliation.[20]

History

Origen, traditionally considered a 3rd-century proponent of Universal Reconciliation

Universalist writers such as George T. Knight have claimed that Universalism was a widely held view among theologians in Early Christianity.[21] These included such important figures such as Alexandrian scholar Origen as well as Clement of Alexandria, a Christian theologian.[21] Origen and Clement both included the existence of a non-eternal Hell in their teachings. Hell was remedial, in that it was a place one went to purge one’s sins before entering into Heaven.[22]

The first undisputed documentations of Christian Universalist ideas occurred in 17th-century England and 18th-century Europe as well as in colonial America. Between 1648-1697 English activist Gerrard Winstanley, writer Richard Coppin, and dissenter Jane Leade, each taught that God would grant all human beings salvation. The same teachings were later spread throughout 18th-century France and America by George de Benneville. People who taught this doctrine in America would later become known as the Universalist Church of America.[23]

The Greek term apocatastas came to be related by some to the beliefs of Christian Universalism, but central to the doctrine was the restitution, or restoration of all sinful beings to God, and to His state of blessedness. In early Patristics, usage of the term is distinct.

Universalist theology

Universalist theology is grounded in history, scripture and assumptions about the nature of God. Thomas Whittemore wrote the book “100 Scriptural Proofs that Jesus Christ Will Save All Mankind”[24] quoting both Old and New Testament verses which support the Universalist viewpoint.

Some Bible verses he cites and are cited by other Christian Universalists are:

  1. 1 Corinthians 15:22[25]
    • “For as in Adam all die, so also in Christ shall all be made alive.” (ESV)
  2. 2 Peter 3:9
    • “The Lord is not slow to fulfill his promise as some count slowness, but is patient toward you, not wishing that any should perish, but that all should reach repentance.” (ESV)
  3. 1 Timothy 2:3–6[25]
    • “This is good, and pleases God our Savior, who wants all men to be saved and to come to a knowledge of the truth. For there is one God and one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus, who gave himself as a ransom for ALL men—the testimony given in its proper time.” (NIV)
  4. 1 John 2:2
    • “He is the atoning sacrifice for our sins, and not only for ours but also for the sins of the whole world.” (NIV)
  5. 1 Timothy 4:10[25]
    • “For to this end we toil and strive, because we have our hope set on the living God, who is the Savior of all people, especially of those who believe.” (ESV)
  6. Romans 11:32[25]
    • “For God has bound all men over to disobedience so that he may have mercy on them all.” (NIV)

Mistranslations

Christian Universalists point towards the mistranslations of the Greek word αιών (Lit. aion), as giving rise to the idea of Eternal Hell, and the idea that some people will not be saved.[15][26][27]

This Greek word is the origin of the modern English word aeon, which refers to a period of time or an epoch.

The 19th century theologian Marvin Vincent wrote about the word aion, and the supposed connotations of “eternal” or “temporal”:

Aion, transliterated aeon, is a period of longer or shorter duration, having a beginning and an end, and complete in itself. […] Neither the noun nor the adjective, in themselves, carry the sense of endless or everlasting.”[28]

Dr. Ken Vincent writes that “When it (aion) was translated into Latin Vulgate, “aion” became “aeternam” which means “eternal”.[15]

Catholicism

The first use of the term “Catholic Church” (literally meaning “universal church”) was by the church father Saint Ignatius of Antioch in his Letter to the Smyrnaeans (circa 100 AD).

The Catholic church believes that God judges everyone based only on their moral acts,[30] that no one should be subject to human misery,[31] that everyone is equal in dignity yet distinct in individuality before God,[32] that no one should be discriminated against because of their sin or concupiscence,[33] and that apart from coercion[34] God exhausts every means to save mankind from evil: original holiness being intended for everyone,[35] the irrevocable Old Testament covenants,[36][37] each religion being a share in the truth,[38] elements of sanctification in non-Catholic Christian communities,[39] the good people of every religion and nation,[40] everyone being called to baptism and confession,[41][42] and purgatory, suffrages, and indulgences for the dead.[43][44][45] The church believes that everyone is predestined to heaven,[46] that no one is predestined to hell,[47] that everyone is redeemed by Christ’s Passion,[48] that no one is excluded from the church except by sin,[49] and that everyone can either love God by loving others unto going to heaven or reject God by sin unto going to hell.[50][51] The church believes that God’s predestination takes everything into account,[52] and that his providence brings out of evil a greater good,[53] as evidenced, the church believes, by the Passion of Christ being all at once predestined by God,[54] foretold in Scripture,[55] necessitated by original sin,[56] authored by everyone who sins,[57] caused by Christ’s executioners,[58] and freely planned and undergone by Christ.[59][60] The church believes that everyone who goes to heaven joins the church,[61][62] and that from the beginning God intended Israel to be the beginning of the church,[63] wherein God would unite all persons to each other and to God.[64] The church believes that heaven and hell are eternal.[65][66]

Hinduism

See also: Hinduism

Author David Frawley says that Hinduism has a “background universalism” and its teachings contain a “universal relevance.”[67] Hinduism is also naturally religiously pluralistic.[68] A well-known Rig Vedic hymn says: “Truth is One, though the sages know it variously.”[69] Similarly, in the Bhagavad Gītā (4:11), God, manifesting as an incarnation, states: “As people approach me, so I receive them. All paths lead to me.”[70] The Hindu religion has no theological difficulties in accepting degrees of truth in other religions. Hinduism emphasizes that everyone actually worships the same God, whether one knows it or not.[71]

While Hinduism has an openness and tolerance towards other religions, it also has a wide range of diversity within it.[72] There are considered to be six orthodox Hindu schools of philosophy/theology,[73] as well as multiple unorthodox or “hetrodox” traditions called darshanas.[74]

Hindu Universalism

Main articles: Neo-Vedanta and Hindu reform movements

Hindu Universalism, also called Neo-Vedanta[75] and neo-Hinduism,[76] is a modern interpretation of Hinduism which developed in response to western colonialism and orientalism. It denotes the ideology that all religions are true and therefore worthy of toleration and respect.[77]

It is a modern interpretation that aims to present Hinduism as a “homogenized ideal of Hinduism”[78] with Advaita Vedanta as its central doctrine.[79] For example, it presents that:

… an imagined “integral unity” that was probably little more than an “imagined” view of the religious life that pertained only to a cultural elite and that empirically speaking had very little reality “on the ground,” as it were, throughout the centuries of cultural development in the South Asian region.[80]

Hinduism embraces universalism by conceiving the whole world as a single family that deifies the one truth, and therefore it accepts all forms of beliefs and dismisses labels of distinct religions which would imply a division of identity.[81][82][83][self-published source]

This modernised re-interpretation has become a broad current in Indian culture,[79][84] extending far beyond the Dashanami Sampradaya, the Advaita Vedanta Sampradaya founded by Adi Shankara. An early exponent of Hindu Universalism was Ram Mohan Roy, who established the Brahmo Samaj.[85] Hindu Universalism was popularised in the 20th century in both India and the west by Vivekananda[86][79] and Sarvepalli Radhakrishnan.[79] Veneration for all other religions was articulated by Gandhi:

After long study and experience, I have come to the conclusion that [1] all religions are true; [2] all religions have some error in them; [3] all religions are almost as dear to me as my own Hinduism, in as much as all human beings should be as dear to one as one’s own close relatives. My own veneration for other faiths is the same as that for my own faith; therefore no thought of conversion is possible.[87]

Western orientalists played an important role in this popularisation, regarding Vedanta to be the “central theology of Hinduism”.[79] Oriental scholarship portrayed Hinduism as a “single world religion”,[79] and denigrated the heterogeneousity of Hindu beliefs and practices as ‘distortions’ of the basic teachings of Vedanta.[88]

Islam

Further information: Ummah, Divisions of the world in Islam, People of the Book, Dhimmi, and Dawah

Islam recognizes to a certain extent the validity of the Abrahamic religions, the Quran identifying Jews, Christians, and “Sabi’un” (usually taken as a reference to the Mandaeans) as “people of the Book” (ahl al-kitab). Later Islamic theologians expanded this definition to include Zoroastrians, and later even Hindus, as the early Islamic empire brought many people professing these religions under its dominion, but the Qur’an explicitly identifies only Jews, Christians, and Sabians as People of the Book. The relation between Islam and universalism has assumed crucial importance in the context of political Islam or Islamism, particularly in reference to Sayyid Qutb, a leading member of the Muslim Brotherhood movement, and one of the key contemporary philosophers of Islam.[92]

There are several views within Islam with respect to Universalism. According to the most inclusive teachings, common among the liberal Muslim movements, all monotheistic religions or people of the book have a chance of salvation. For example, Surah 2:62,256 states that:[93]

Verily! Those who believe and those who are Jews and Christians, and Sabians, whoever believes in Allah and the Last Day and do righteous good deeds shall have their reward with their Lord, on them shall be no fear, nor shall they grieve…let there be no compulsion in religion

However, the most exclusive teachings disagree. For example, the Salafi refer to Surah 9:5,29:

Then, when the sacred months have passed, slay the idolaters [mushrikun] wherever ye find them, and take them, and besiege them, and lay in wait in every stratagem of war. But if they repent and establish worship and pay the Zakat, then leave their way free. Lo! Allah is Forgiving, Merciful […] Fight against such of those who have been given the Scripture [i.e. people of the book] as believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, and forbid not that which Allah hath forbidden by His messenger, and follow not the Religion of Truth, until they pay the jizya readily, being brought low [in submission].

The interpretation of all of these passages are hotly contested amongst various schools of thought, traditionalist and reform-minded, and branches of Islam, from the reforming Quranism and Ahmadiyya to the ultra-traditionalist Salafi, as is the doctrine of abrogation (naskh) which is used to determine which verses take precedence, based on reconstructed chronology, with later verses superseding earlier ones. The traditional chronology places Surah 9 as the last or second-to-last surah revealed, thus, in traditional exegesis, it gains a large power of abrogation, and verses 9:5,29,73 are held to have abrogated 2:256[94] The ahadith also play a major role in this, and different schools of thought assign different weightings and rulings of authenticity to different hadith, with the four schools of Sunni thought accepting the Six Authentic Collections, generally along with the Muwatta Imam Malik. Depending on the level of acceptance of rejection of certain traditions, the interpretation of the Koran can be changed immensely, from the Qur’anists and Ahmadiyya who reject the ahadith, to the Salafi, or ahl al-hadith, who hold the entirety of the traditional collections in great reverence.

Traditional Islam[94][95] views the world as bipartite, consisting of the House of Islam, that is, where people live under the Sharia;[95] and the House of War, that is, where the people do not live under Sharia, which must be proselytized[95][96][97] using whatever resources available, including, in some traditionalist and conservative interpretations,[98] the use of violence, as holy struggle in the path of God,[91][98][99] to either convert its inhabitants to Islam, or to rule them under the Shariah (cf. dhimmi).[100][101]

Judaism

Main articles: Jewish views on religious pluralism,

A handwritten copy of the Torah.

Judaism teaches that God chose the Jewish people to be in a unique covenant with God, and one of their beliefs is that Jewish people were charged by the Torah with a specific mission—to be a light unto the nations, and to exemplify the covenant with God as described in the Torah to other nations. This view does not preclude a belief that God also has a relationship with other peoples—rather, Judaism holds that God had entered into a covenant with all humanity as Noachides, and that Jews and non-Jews alike have a relationship with God, as well as being universal in the sense that it is open to all mankind.[102]

Modern Jews such as Emmanuel Levinas advocate a universalist mindset that is performed through particularist behavior.[103] An on-line organization, the Jewish Spiritual Leaders Institute founded and led by Steven Blane, who calls himself an “American Jewish Universalist Rabbi”, believes in a more inclusive version of Jewish Universalism, stating that “God equally chose all nations to be lights unto the world, and we have much to learn and share with each other. We can only accomplish Tikkun Olam by our unconditional acceptance of each other’s peaceful doctrines.”[104]

Noahidism or Noachidism is a monotheistic branch of Judaism based on the Seven Laws of Noah, and their traditional interpretations within Rabbinic Judaism. According to the Jewish law, non-Jews (Gentiles) are not obligated to convert to Judaism, but they are required to observe the Seven Laws of Noah to be assured of a place in the World to Come (Olam Ha-Ba), the final reward of the righteous. The divinely ordained penalty for violating any of these Noahide Laws is discussed in the Talmud, but in practical terms it is subject to the working legal system which is established by the society at large. Those who subscribe to the observance of the Noahic Covenant are referred to as B’nei Noach (בני נח, “Children of Noah”) or Noahides. Supporting organizations have been established around the world over the past decades by either Noahides or Orthodox Jews.

Manichaeism

Main article: Manichaeism

Manichaeism, like Christian Gnosticism and Zurvanism, was inherently universalist.[105]

Sikhism

In Sikhism, all the religions of the world are compared to rivers flowing into a single ocean. Although the Sikh gurus did not agree with the practices of fasting, idolatry and pilgrimage during their times, they stressed that all religions should be tolerated and considered on equal footing. The Sikh scripture, the Guru Granth Sahib, contains the writings of not just the Sikh guru themselves, but the writings of several Hindu and Muslim saints, known as the Bhagats.

The very first word of the Sikh scripture is “Ik”, followed by “Oh-ang-kar”. This literally means that there is only one god, and that one is wholesome, inclusive of the whole universe. It further goes on to state that all of creation, and all energy is part of this primordial being. As such, it is described in scripture over and over again, that all that occurs is part of the divine will, and as such, has to be accepted. It occurs for a reason, even if its beyond the grasp of one person to understand.

Although Sikhism does not teach that men are created as an image of God, it states that the essence of the One is to be found throughout all of its creation. As was said by Yogi Bhajan, the man who is credited with having brought Sikhism to the West:

“If you can’t see God in all, you can’t see God at all”. (Sri Singh Sahib, Yogi Bhajan)[106]

The First Sikh Guru, Guru Nanak said himself:

“There is no Hindu, there is no Muslim”.[107][108][109]

By this, Guru Nanak meant that there is no distinction between religion in God’s eyes, whether polytheist, monotheist, pantheist, or even atheist, all that one needs to gain salvation is purity of heart, tolerance of all beings, compassion and kindness. Unlike many of the major world religions, Sikhism does not have missionaries, instead it believes men have the freedom to find their own path to salvation.

Unitarian Universalism

Main article: Unitarian Universalism

A sign of the Unitarian Universalist Association in Rochester, Minnesota. Unitarianism in the English-speaking world largely evolved into a pluralistic liberal religious movement, while retaining its distinctiveness in continental Europe and elsewhere.

Unitarian Universalism (UU) is a theologically liberal religion characterized by a “free and responsible search for truth and meaning”.[110] Unitarian Universalists do not share a creed; rather, they are unified by their shared search for spiritual growth and by the understanding that an individual’s theology is a result of that search and not a result of obedience to an authoritarian requirement. Unitarian Universalists draw from all major world religions[111] and many different theological sources and have a wide range of beliefs and practices.

While having its origins in Christianity, UU is no longer a Christian church. As of 2006, fewer than about 20% of Unitarian Universalists identified themselves as Christian.[112] Contemporary Unitarian Universalism espouses a pluralist approach to religious belief, whereby members may describe themselves as humanist, agnostic, deist, atheist, pagan, Christian, monotheist, pantheist, polytheist, or assume no label at all.

The Unitarian Universalist Association (UUA) was formed in 1961, a consolidation of the American Unitarian Association, established in 1825, and the Universalist Church of America,[113] established in 1866. It is headquartered in Boston, and mainly serves churches in the United States. The Canadian Unitarian Council became an independent body in 2002.[114]

Zoroastrianism

Faravahar (or Ferohar), one of the primary symbols of Zoroastrianism, believed to be the depiction of a Fravashi (guardian spirit)

Main article: Zoroastrianism

Some varieties of Zoroastrian (such as Zurvanism) are universalistic in application to all races, but not necessarily universalist in the sense of universal salvation.[115]

Critics

In his book The Miracle of Theism: Arguments for and against the Existence of God, the Australian philosopher J. L. Mackie noted that whilst in the past a miracle performed by Jesus had served as proof to Christians that he was the ‘one true God’, and that a miracle performed by another religion’s deity had served as a (contradictory) proof to its own adherents, the universalist approach resulted in any such miracle being accepted as a validation of all religions, a situation that he characterised as “Miracle-workers of the world, unite!”[116]

References

  1. Vedanta Society of Southern California Harmony of Religions
  2. King 2002.
  3. Otis Ainsworth Skinner (1807-1861), A Series of Sermons in Defense of the Doctrine of Universal Salvation, Page 209, It is not part of mainline Christian doctrine either Catholic or Protestant. 
  4. Bonnett, A. (2005). Anti-Racism. Routledge.
  5. Kemerling, Garth (November 12, 2011). “A Dictionary of Philosophical Terms and Names”. Philosophy Pages. According to Immanuel Kantand Richard Mervyn Hare…moral imperatives must be regarded as equally binding on everyone.
  6. Gowans, Chris (Dec 9, 2008). Edward N. Zalta (ed.). “Moral Relativism”. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2012 ed.). 
  7. “Unitarian Universalism”. BBC. Retrieved 4 May 2012.
  8. “Unitarian Universalism”. Retrieved 4 May 2012.
  9. Buck, Christopher (1999). Paradise and Paradigm: Key Symbols in Persian Christianity and the Bahá’í Faith. Albany: State University of New York Press. p. 292.
  10. Stockman, Robert (2000). “The Baha’i Faith”. In Beversluis, Joel (ed.). Sourcebook of the World’s Religions. New World Library. p. 7. ISBN1-57731-121-3.
  11. Smith, Peter (2008). An Introduction to the Baha’i Faith. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. p. 138. ISBN0-521-86251-5.
  12. Smith, Peter (2008). An Introduction to the Baha’i Faith. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. p. 139. ISBN0-521-86251-5.
  13. Smith, Peter (2000). “peace”. A concise encyclopedia of the Bahá’í Faith. Oxford: Oneworld Publications. pp. 266–267. ISBN1-85168-184-1.
  14. “What Is Christian Universalism?”. Auburn.edu. Retrieved 2017-12-17.
  15. The Salvation Conspiracy: How Hell Became Eternal
  16. Gary Amirault. “The Fate of the Wicked”. Tentmaker.org. Retrieved 2017-12-17.
  17. Guild, E.E. ‘Arguments in Favour of Universalism’. http://www.tentmaker.org/books/InFavorCh20.htmlhttp://godfire.net/eby/saviour_of_the_world.htmlhttp://www.godfire.net/Hellidx.html
  18. The Bible Hell. TentMaker.org. “The immortal soul is not meant, but the life. As though Jesus had said: “Fear Not those who can only kill the body, but rather him, who if he chose could destroy the soul”
  19. Miriam Van Scott (10 February 2015). “Purgatorial Hell”. The Encyclopedia of Hell: A Comprehensive Survey of the Underworld. St. Martin’s Press. p. 240. ISBN978-1-4668-9119-7.
  20. “See section entitled “Five Principles of Faith““. Auburn.edu. Retrieved 2011-11-09.
  21. Knight, George T. (1950) [1912]. “Universalists”. The New Schaff–Herzog Encyclopedia of Religious Knowledge. 12. Grand Rapids, Michigan: Baker Book House. p. 96. OCLC1002955.The New Schaff-Herzog Encyclopedia of Religious Knowledge at the Internet Archive (Vol. 12).
  22. “Purgatorial Hell FAQ”. StanRock.net. Retrieved 2016-01-19.
  23. Wyatt, Neal; Dwyer, Tierney V; Dwyer, Tierney V (2008). “Unitarian Universalism: A Research Guide”. Reference & User Services Quarterly. 47(3): 210–214. doi:10.5860/rusq.47n3.210.
  24. “100 Scriptural Proofs That Jesus Christ Will Save All Mankind”. Tentmaker.org. Retrieved 2017-12-17.
  25. Tentmaker. “The Fate of the Wicked”. tentmaker.org. Tentmaker. Retrieved 29 June 2012.
  26. “Eternal” Punishment (Matthew 25:46) Is NOT Found In The Greek New Testament.
  27. A look at the word “aionion”
  28. Vincent, Marvin. “Note on Olethron Aionion (eternal destruction)”. Word Studies in the New Testament. Retrieved 18 June 2012.
  29. John Meyendorff, Catholicity and the Church, St Vladimirs Seminary Press, 1997, ISBN0-88141-006-3, p. 7
  30. Catechism of the Catholic Church 2516
  31. Catechism of the Catholic Church 2448
  32. Catechism of the Catholic Church 1935-1937
  33. Catechism of the Catholic Church 2358
  34. Catechism of the Catholic Church 311
  35. Catechism of the Catholic Church 405
  36. Catechism of the Catholic Church 123
  37. Catechism of the Catholic Church 71
  38. Catechism of the Catholic Church 839-845
  39. Catechism of the Catholic Church 819
  40. Catechism of the Catholic Church 761
  41. Catechism of the Catholic Church 1246
  42. Catechism of the Catholic Church 1446
  43. Catechism of the Catholic Church 1030-1031
  44. Catechism of the Catholic Church 1032
  45. Catechism of the Catholic Church 1479
  46. Catechism of the Catholic Church 381
  47. Catechism of the Catholic Church 1037
  48. Catechism of the Catholic Church 605
  49. Catechism of the Catholic Church 1443-1445
  50. Catechism of the Catholic Church 1033
  51. Catechism of the Catholic Church 1861
  52. Catechism of the Catholic Church 600
  53. Catechism of the Catholic Church 312
  54. Catechism of the Catholic Church 599
  55. Catechism of the Catholic Church 601
  56. Catechism of the Catholic Church 410-412
  57. Catechism of the Catholic Church 598
  58. Catechism of the Catholic Church 597
  59. Catechism of the Catholic Church 610
  60. Catechism of the Catholic Church 621
  61. Catechism of the Catholic Church 1024
  62. Catechism of the Catholic Church 962
  63. Catechism of the Catholic Church 761-762
  64. Catechism of the Catholic Church 775
  65. Catechism of the Catholic Church 1051-1053
  66. Catechism of the Catholic Church 1056-1058
  67. Pluralism and Universalism Within Hinduism
  68. Hindu American Foundation “Hinduism Basics”
  69. Rig Veda 1.164.46
  70. Page 194 in Eknath Easwaran (2008). Timeless wisdom: Passages for meditation from the world’s saints & sages (see article). Tomales, CA: Nilgiri Press. ISBN1-58638-027-3. Similar to Eknath Easwaran (2007). The Bhagavad Gita, 2nd ed. Tomales, CA: Nilgiri Press, p. 117. ISBN 1586380192 (which substitutes “they” for “people”). Transliteration from Winthrop Sargeant (1984). The Bhagavad Gita. Albany: State University of New York Press, p. 211. ISBN0-87395-831-4, which translates the same passage as “They who, in whatever way, take refuge in Me, them I reward.”
  71. See Swami Bhaskarananda, Essentials of Hinduism (Viveka Press 2002) ISBN1-884852-04-1
  72. Hindu American Foundation Hinduism Basics “It is a richly diverse family of philosophies, traditions, and practices that have been followed primarily throughout Asia for thousands of years.”
  73. “Shat-darshana: The Philosophical Schools of Sanatana Dharma”
  74. Indian Philosophy: Orthodox and Heterodox Schools
  75. Frank Morales, Neo-Vedanta: The problem with Hindu Universalism
  76. King 2002, p. 93.
  77. Editors of Hinduism Today (2007). What Is Hinduism?: Modern Adventures Into a Profound Global Faith. Himalayan Academy Publications. p. 416. ISBN1934145009.
  78. Yelle 2012, p. 338.
  79. King 2002, p. 135.
  80. Larson 2012, p. 313.
  81. (Rigveda 1:164:46) “Ekam sat vipra bahudha vadanti” – Truth is one; sages call it many names
  82. (Maha Upanishad: Chapter 6, Verse 72) “Vasudhaiva Kutumbakam” – The entire world is a one big family
  83. Badlani, Hiro (2008). Hinduism: Path of the Ancient Wisdom. iUniverse. p. 303. ISBN978-0-595-70183-4.
  84. Sinari 2000.
  85. Ghazi 2010.
  86. Michaelson 2009, p. 79-81.
  87. M. K. Gandhi, All Men Are Brothers: Life and Thoughts of Mahatma Gandhi as told in his own words, Paris, UNESCO 1958, p 60.
  88. King 1999, p. 135.
  89. Crone, Patricia (2005). God’s Rule: Government and Islam: Six Centuries of Medieval Islamic Political Thought. Columbia University Press. p. 472. ISBN978-0-231-13291-6.
  90. Lapidus, Ira M. (2014). Ira M. Lapidus. Cambridge University Press. p. 1000. ISBN9780521514309.
  91. Karsh, Efraim (2007). Islamic Imperialism: A History(PDF). Yale University Press. p. 304. ISBN9780300122633.
  92. Mura, Andrea (2014). “The Inclusive Dynamics of Islamic Universalism: From the Vantage Point of Sayyid Qutb’s Critical Philosophy”. Comparative Philosophy. Retrieved 2015-05-12.
  93. 1. S. A. Rahman, Punishment of Apostasy in Islam, Institute of Islamic Culture, Lahore, 1972
  94. Ibn Kathir, Ismail (1301-1373) (2000). Sheikh Safiur-Rahman Al-Mubarakpuri (ed.). Tafsir al-Qur’an al-Aziz (Tafsir Ibn Kathir) (in English and Arabic) (English Abridged ed.). Riyadh, Saudi Arabia: Maktaba Darussalam. p. 6608. ISBN978-1-59144-020-8.
  95. Khalil, Ahmed (2002-05-27). “Dar Al-Islam And Dar Al-Harb: Its Definition and Significance”. IslamWay (English). Retrieved 2015-05-12.
  96. Ye’or, Bat (1985). The Dhimmi: Jews and Christians Under Islam. Farleign Dickinson University Press. p. 444. ISBN978-0838632628.
  97. Ye’or, Bat. The Decline of Eastern Christianity Under Islam: From Jihad to Dhimmitude: 7th–20th Centuries. Farleigh Dickinson University Press. p. 522. ISBN978-0-8386-3688-6.
  98. Ibn Kathir’s Tafsir al-Qur’an al-Aziz
  99. Sayyid Qutb Milestones
  100. Durie, Mark (2010). The Third Choice: Islam, Dhimmitude and Freedom. Deror Books. p. 288. ISBN978-0-9807223-1-4.
  101. Ye’or, Bat (2001). Islam and Dhimmitude: Where Civilizations Collide. Farleigh Dickinson University Press. p. 528. ISBN978-0-8386-3942-9.
  102. Polish, David (1985). “Covenant-Jewish Universalism and Particularism”. Judaism. 34 (3): 284.
  103. Magid, Shaul. “Social Justice and the Future of ….”Tablet Magazine. 13 June 2018. 5 February 2019.
  104. Staff. “Jewish Universalism”. Jewish Spiritual Leaders Institute. Google Inc. Retrieved 29 June 2012.
  105. Manfred Hutter (January 1993). “Manichaeism in the Early Sasanian Empire”. 40. BRILL. JSTOR3270395.
  106. “About the Siri Singh Sahib – Sikh Dharma International”. www.sikhdharma.org. Retrieved 2017-11-02.
  107. “There is no Hindu and no Musalman – SikhiWiki, free Sikh encyclopedia”. www.sikhiwiki.org. Retrieved 2016-11-19.
  108. “Sikhism Religion of the Sikh People”. www.sikhs.org. Retrieved 2016-11-19.
  109. Munde, Amarpreet Singh. “Guru Nanak (for Children) – No Hindu, and no Muslim”. www.gurmat.info. Retrieved 2016-11-19.
  110. (The 4th principle of Unitarian Universalism)UUA.org Seven principles
  111. “Major Religions Ranked by Size”. Adherents.com. Retrieved April 19,2013.
  112. Ford, James Ishmael (2006). Zen Master Who?. Wisdom Publications. p. 187. ISBN0-86171-509-8.
  113. Harvard Divinity School: Timeline of Significant Events in the Merger of the Unitarian and Universalist Churches During the 1900s
  114. CUC-UUA Tradition. Canadian Unitarian Council Growing Vital Religious Communities In Canada
  115. Jonathan Porter Berkey The formation of Islam: religion and society in the Near East 2003 p28 
  116. Mackie, J. L. (November 1982). The Miracle of Theism: Arguments for and against the Existence of God. Oxford University Press. p. 15. ISBN978-0198246824. 
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Leave a Reply

Scroll Up
%d bloggers like this: