Mechanisms of Mindfulness Meditation
Four components of mindfulness meditation have been proposed to describe much of the mechanism of action by which mindfulness meditation may work: attention regulation, body awareness, emotion regulation, and change in perspective on the self. All of the components described above are connected to each other. For example, when a person is triggered by an external stimulus, the executive attention system attempts to maintain a mindful state. There is also a heightened body awareness such as a rapid heartbeat which triggers an emotional response. The response is then regulated so that it does not become habitual, but constantly changes from moment to moment experience. This eventually leads to a change in the perspective of the self.
- Mindfulness meditators showed greater activation of rostral anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) and dorsal medial prefrontal cortex (MPFC). This suggests that meditators have a stronger processing of conflict/distraction and are more engaged in emotional regulation. However, as the meditators become more efficient at focused attention, regulation becomes unnecessary and consequentially decreases activation of ACC in the long term.
- The cortical thickness in the dorsal ACC was also found to be greater in the gray matter of experienced meditators.
- There is an increased frontal midline theta rhythm, which is related to attention demanding tasks and is believed to be indicative of ACC activation. High midline theta rhythm has been associated with lowest anxiety score in the Manifest Anxiety Scale (MAS), the highest score in the extrovertive scale of the Maudsley Personality Inventory (MPI) and the lowest score in the neurotic scale of MPI.
The ACC detects conflicting information coming from distractions. When a person is presented with a conflicting stimulus, the brain initially processes the stimulus incorrectly. This is known as error-related negativity (ERN). Before the ERN reaches a threshold, the correct conflict is detected by the frontocentral N2. After the correction, the rostral ACC is activated and allows for executive attention to the correct stimulus. Therefore, mindfulness meditation could potentially be a method for treating attention related disorders such as ADHD and bipolar disorder.
- Meditators showed a greater cortical thickness  and greater gray matter concentration in the right anterior insula.
- On the contrary, subjects who had undergone 8 weeks of mindfulness training showed no significant change in gray matter concentration of the insula, but rather an increase gray matterconcentration of the temporo-parietal junction.
The insula is responsible for awareness to stimuli and the thickness of its gray matter correlates to the accuracy and detection of the stimuli by the nervous system. Qualitative evidence suggests that mindfulness meditation impacts body awareness, however this component is not well characterized.
- Mindfulness meditation regulates emotions via increased activation of the dorso-medial PFC and rostral ACC.
- Increased activation of the ventrolateral PFC can regulate emotion by decreasing the activity of the amygdala. This was also predicted by a study that observed the effect of a person’s mood/attitude during mindfulness on brain activation.
Lateral prefrontal cortex (lPFC) is important for selective attention while ventral prefrontal cortex (vPFC) is involved in inhibiting a response. As noted before, the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) has been noted for maintaining attention to a stimulus. The amygdala is responsible for generating emotions. Mindfulness meditation is believed to be able to regulate negative thoughts and decrease emotional reactivity through these regions of the brain. Emotion regulation deficits have been noted in disorders such as borderline personality disorder  and depression. These deficits have been associated with reduced prefrontal activation and increased amygdala activity, which mindfulness meditation might be able to attenuate.
Pain is known to activate the following regions of the brain: the anterior cingulate cortex, anterior/posterior insula, primary/secondary somatosensory cortices, and the thalamus. Mindfulness meditation may provide several methods by which a person can consciously regulate pain.
- Brown and Jones found that mindfulness meditation decreased pain anticipation in the right parietal cortex and mid-cingulate cortex. Mindfulness meditation also increased the activity of the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) and ventromedial-prefrontal cortex (vm-PFC). Since the vm-PFC is involved in inhibiting emotional responses to stimuli, anticipation to pain was concluded to be reduced by cognitive and emotional control.
- Another study by Grant revealed that meditators showed greater activation of insula, thalamus, and mid-cingulate cortex while a lower activation of the regions responsible for emotion control (medial-PFC, OFC, and amygdala). Meditators were believed to be in a mental state that allowed them to pay close attention to the sensory input from the stimuli and simultaneously inhibit any appraisal or emotional reactivity.
Brown and Jones found that meditators showed no difference in pain sensitivity but rather the anticipation in pain. However, Grant’s research showed that meditators experienced lower sensitivity to pain. These conflicting studies illustrate that the exact mechanism may vary with the expertise level or meditation technique.
- Ludwig David S (2008-09-17). “MIndfulness in medicine”. JAMA. 300 (11): 1350–1352. doi:10.1001/jama.300.11.1350. ISSN0098-7484. PMID18799450.
- Bishop, Scott R.; Lau, Mark; Shapiro, Shauna; Carlson, Linda; Anderson, Nicole D.; Carmody, James; Segal, Zindel V.; Abbey, Susan; Speca, Michael (2004-09-01). “Mindfulness: A Proposed Operational Definition”. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice. 11 (3): 230–241. CiteSeerX10.1.1.168.6212. doi:10.1093/clipsy.bph077. ISSN1468-2850.
- Desbordes, Gaëlle; Gard, Tim; Hoge, Elizabeth A.; Hölzel, Britta K.; Kerr, Catherine; Lazar, Sara W.; Olendzki, Andrew; Vago, David R. (2014-01-21). “Moving Beyond Mindfulness: Defining Equanimity as an Outcome Measure in Meditation and Contemplative Research”. Mindfulness. 6 (2): 356–372. doi:10.1007/s12671-013-0269-8. ISSN1868-8527. PMC4350240. PMID25750687.
- Holzel B. K.; Lazar S. W.; Gard T.; Schuman-Olivier Z.; Vago D. R.; Ott U. (2011). “How Does Mindfulness Meditation Work? Proposing Mechanisms of Action From a Conceptual and Neural Perspective”. Perspectives on Psychological Science. 6 (6): 537–559. doi:10.1177/1745691611419671. PMID26168376.
- Hölzel B.K.; Ott U.; Hempel H.; Hackl A.; Wolf K.; Stark R.; Vaitl D. (2007). “Differential engagement of anterior cingulate cortex and adjacent medial frontal cortex in adept meditators and nonmeditators”. Neuroscience Letters. 421 (1): 16–21. doi:10.1016/j.neulet.2007.04.074. PMID17548160.
- Brefczynski-Lewis J.A.; Lutz A.; Schaefer H.S.; Levinson D.B.; Davidson R.J. (2007). “Neural correlates of attentional expertise in long-term meditation practitioners”. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 104 (27): 11483–11488. doi:10.1073/pnas.0606552104. PMC1903340. PMID17596341.
- Grant J.A.; Courtemanche J.; Duerden E.G.; Duncan G.H.; Rainville P. (2010). “Cortical thickness and pain sensitivity in Zen meditators”. Emotion. 10(1): 43–53. doi:10.1037/a0018334. PMID20141301.
- Asada H.; Fukuda Y.; Tsunoda S.; Yamaguchi M.; Tonoike M. (1999). “Frontal midline theta rhythms reflect alternative activation of prefrontal cortex and anterior cingulate cortex in humans”. Neuroscience Letters. 274 (1): 29–32. doi:10.1016/s0304-3940(99)00679-5. PMID10530512.
- Inanaga K (1998). “Frontal midline theta rhythm and mental activity”. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 52 (6): 555–66. doi:10.1046/j.1440-1819.1998.00452.x. PMID9895201.
- van Veen V.; Carter C.S. (2002). “The anterior cingulate as a conflict monitor: FMRI and ERP studies”. Physiology & Behavior. 77 (4–5): 477–482. doi:10.1016/s0031-9384(02)00930-7.
- Hölzel, B.K., Ott, U., Hempel, H., & Stark, R. (2006, May). Wie wirkt Achtsamkeit? Eine Interviewstudie mit erfahrenen Meditierenden(How does mindfulness work? An interview study with experienced meditators). Paper presented at the 24th Symposium of the Section for Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy of the German Society for Psychology, Würzburg, Germany.
- Lazar S.W.; Kerr C.E.; Wasserman R.H.; Gray J.R.; Greve D.N.; Treadway M.T.; Fischl B. (2005). “Meditation experience is associated with increased cortical thickness”. NeuroReport. 16 (17): 1893–1897. doi:10.1097/01.wnr.0000186598.66243.19. PMC1361002. PMID16272874.
- Hölzel B.K.; Ott U.; Gard T.; Hempel H.; Weygandt M.; Morgen K.; Vaitl D. (2008). “Investigation of mindfulness meditation practitioners with voxel-based morphometry”. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience. 3 (1): 55–61. doi:10.1093/scan/nsm038. PMC2569815. PMID19015095.
- Hölzel B.K.; Carmody J.; Vangel M.; Congleton C.; Yerramsetti S.M.; Gard T.; Lazar S.W. (2011). “Mindfulness practice leads to increases in regional brain gray matter density”. Psychiatry Research. 191 (1): 36–43. doi:10.1016/j.pscychresns.2010.08.006. PMC3004979. PMID21071182.
- Craig A.D. (2003). “Interoception: The sense of the physiological condition of the body”. Current Opinion in Neurobiology. 13 (4): 500–505. doi:10.1016/s0959-4388(03)00090-4.
- Critchley H.D.; Wiens S.; Rotshtein P.; Ohman A.; Dolan R.J. (2004). “Neural systems supporting interoceptive awareness”. Nature Neuroscience. 7 (2): 189–195. doi:10.1038/nn1176. hdl:21.11116/0000-0001-A2FB-D. PMID14730305.
- Harenski C.L.; Hamann S. (2006). “Neural correlates of regulating negative emotions related to moral violations”. NeuroImage. 30 (1): 313–324. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.09.034. PMID16249098.
- Beauregard M.; Levesque J.; Bourgouin P. (2001). “Neural correlates of conscious self-regulation of emotion”. Journal of Neuroscience. 21 (18): RC165. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.21-18-j0001.2001.
- Schaefer S.M.; Jackson D.C.; Davidson R.J.; Aguirre G.K.; Kimberg D.Y.; Thompson-Schill S.L. (2002). “Modulation of amygdalar activity by the conscious regulation of negative emotion”. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 14 (6): 913–921. CiteSeerX10.1.1.233.1177. doi:10.1162/089892902760191135. PMID12191458.
- Creswell J.D.; Way B.M.; Eisenberger N.I.; Lieberman M.D. (2007). “Neural correlates of dispositional mindfulness during affect labeling”. Psychosomatic Medicine. 69 (6): 560–565. CiteSeerX10.1.1.432.24. doi:10.1097/psy.0b013e3180f6171f. PMID17634566.
- Silbersweig D.; Clarkin J.F.; Goldstein M.; Kernberg O.F.; Tuescher O.; Levy K.N.; Rauch S.L. (2007). “Failure of frontolimbic inhibitory function in the context of negative emotion in borderline personality disorder”. American Journal of Psychiatry. 164 (12): 1832–1841. doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2007.06010126. PMID18056238.
- Abercrombie H.C.; Schaefer S.M.; Larson C.L.; Oakes T.R.; Lindgren K.A.; Holden J.E.; Davidson R.J. (1998). “Metabolic rate in the right amygdala predicts negative affect in depressed patients”. NeuroReport. 9 (14): 3301–3307. doi:10.1097/00001756-199810050-00028.
- Zeidan F.; Grant J. A.; Brown C. A.; McHaffie J. G.; Coghill R. C. (2012). “Mindfulness meditation-related pain relief: Evidence for unique brain mechanisms in the regulation of pain”. Neuroscience Letters. 520 (2): 165–173. doi:10.1016/j.neulet.2012.03.082. PMC3580050. PMID22487846.
- Brown C.A.; Jones A.K. (2010). “Meditation experience predicts less negative appraisal of pain: electrophysiological evidence for the involvement of anticipatory neural responses”. Pain. 150 (3): 428–438. doi:10.1016/j.pain.2010.04.017. PMID20494517.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia