O loving wisdom of our God!
When all was sin and shame,
A second Adam to the fight
And to the rescue came.
The title “New Adam” is emphasised in the Recapitulation theory of atonement.
The Pauline representation
Paul the Apostle contrasted Adam and Christ as two corporate personalities or representatives (Rom 5:12–21; 1 Cor. 15:20–3, 45–9) and saw human beings as bearing the image of both Adam and Christ (1 Cor. 15:49). Where Adam’s disobedience meant sin and death for all, Christ’s obedience more than made good the harm due to Adam by bringing righteousness and abundance of grace (Rom 5:12–21). As a “life-giving spirit”, the last Adam is risen from the dead and will transform us through resurrection into a heavenly, spiritual existence (1 Cor. 15:22, 45, 48–9). Thus Paul’s Adam Christology involved both the earthly Jesus’ obedience (Rom. 5) and the risen Christ’s role as giver of the Spirit (1 Cor. 15).
The same symbol, used to express Christ as the corporate, representative personality (and Adam as his foreshadow, per Rom. 5:14), was taken up to express Christ’s being: he is “the last Adam” (1 Cor. 15:45), or the “second man from heaven”, and one not made “from earth, of dust” (1 Cor. 15:47; see Gen. 2:7). Some scholars detect an Adamic reference in several other New Testament passages: for example, in the language about “the glory of Christ, who is the image (Gr.:eikōn) of God” (2 Cor. 4:4). Perhaps this is an echo of the language of Genesis 1:26-7 about Adam being created in the divine image. If so, Paul would be thinking here of Christ as the ideal Adam, with his humanity perfectly expressing the divine image. But this exegesis is not fully convincing. One may likewise be less than fully convinced by those who find a reference to Adam in two hymnic or at least poetic passages: Colossians 1:15–20 and Philippians 2:6–11.
Colossians 1:15 In Colossians 1:15, Christ is called “the image (eikōn) of the invisible God, the first-born of all creation”. In isolation, this verse could be taken merely in an Adamic sense as referring to Christ as the first created being, the archetypal human being who visibly reflects God, the invisible Creator. However, the context suggests finding the background in personified wisdom, the perfect image of God (Wisdom 7:26) and the agent of creation (Prov 8:22–31).The verses which follow speak of “all things” being “created through him and for him”, of his being “before all things”, of “all things holding together” in him, and of the plenitude of deity dwelling in him (Colossians 1:16–17,19). Any parallelism with Adam, who was simply made in the divine image and likeness, gets left behind here. On the contrary, every created thing, including the angelic “thrones, dominions, principalities, and authorities” (Col 1:16), is said to have originated through Christ (as creative agent) and for Christ (as final goal), who likewise is the principle of cohesion in holding the universe together. Further, it strains plausibility to argue that a mere Adamic model does justice to the language of “the fullness of God” dwelling in Christ (Col 1:19–20; cf. Col 2:9).
The context of Colossians 1:15, therefore, prompts one to interpret “the image of the invisible God” as pointing to Christ being on the divine side and being the perfect revealer of God — a thought paralleled by John 1:18 and 2 Corinthians4:4. Like the hymn or poem in Colossians, Hebrews also portrays Christ as the exact (divine) counterpart through whom the Father speaks and is revealed, and who is the one that sustains the entire universe: “He reflects the glory of God and bears the very stamp of his nature, upholding the universe by his word of power” (Heb 1:3).
The whole context of Colossians 1:15–20 suggests a more than Adamic and human interpretation of “the first-born of all creation”. Christ is the “first-born” in the sense of being prior to and supreme over all creation, just as by virtue of his resurrection from the dead he is supreme vis-à-vis the Church (Col 1:18. The emphatic and repeated “kai autos” (Gr. for “and he”) of Colossians 1:17,18 underline the absolute “pre-eminence” of Christ in the orders of creation and salvation history; he is pre-eminent both cosmologically and soteriologically. He through whom the universe was created is the same Christ who formed the Church by rising from the dead. He has been active in both creation and redemption.
In the hymn in Philippians 2, any Adamic interpretation of Christ’s prior state of being “in the form of God” and enjoying “equality with God” (Philippians 2:6) seems to be made doubtful by what follows. This divine status and mode of existence stand in counterpoint (the emphatic “but” of “but he emptied himself”) to the subsequent state of “assuming the form of a slave”, “being born in human likeness”, and “being found in human form” (Philippians 2:7). It is what is said in v. 7 that first puts Christ with the community of human beings and their collective image., Adam. Christ belonged to the eternal sphere of divine existence (Philippians 2:6) and joined the human (and Adamic) sphere only when he assumed another mode of existence (Philippians 2:7) which concealed his proper (divine) being. Nevertheless, in talking of Christ as refusing to use for his own advantage or exploit for himself the godhead which was his, v. 6 might alsobe contrasting his humility (in becoming human and dying the death of a slave) with the presumptuous aspiration of Adam (and Eve) to enjoy illegitimate equality with God and become “like God” (Gen 3:5–6).
Post-New Testament symbolism
Whether one accepts the wider circle of references to Adam or limits oneself to the clear references in Romans 5 and 1 Corinthians 15, the New Testament used Adamic language to express the being of Jesus and, even more, his task and goal. In post-New Testament times, the symbol of Adam proved a valuable foil for Clement of Alexandria, Origen (d. c.254), St Athanasius of Alexandria (c.296–373), St Hilary of Poitiers (c.315–367), St Gregory of Nazianzus (329–389), St Gregory of Nyssa (c.330–395), and other Church Fathers, when they presented and interpreted the person and work of Christ. St Irenaeus (c.130–200), in particular, did much to elaborate further Paul’s antithetical parallelism between Adam and Christ, the latter reversing the failure of the first. In a typical passage of his Adversus haereses, he wrote:
The Son of God… was incarnate and made man; and then he summed up in himself the long line of the human race, procuring for us a comprehensive salvation, that we might recover in Christ Jesus what in Adam we had lost, namely the state of being in the image and likeness of God” (3. 18. 1)
The Quran directly compares Jesus to Adam in terms of how he came into existence. Sura Al-Imran says, “Verily, the likeness of Jesus before Allah is the likeness of Adam. He created him from dust, then He said to him: ‘Be!’ – and he was.”
- Watson E. Mills, Roger Aubrey Bullard, eds, Mercer dictionary of the Bible. 1998, p. 10. ISBN0-86554-373-9
- James D. G. Dunn, The Theology of Paul the Apostle. 2006, p. 241 . ISBN0802844235
- In his book, Christology in the Making (1989) p. 115, Christian scholar J.D.G. Dunn assembles evidence to show how not only Rom 5 but also Rom 1–8interpret the human condition, at least partly, in the light of the creation and fall narratives of Genesis.
- An explicit Adam Christology seems to have been introduced by Paul himself — first in 1 Cor. 15 and then in Rom. 5: cf. J.A. Fitzmyer, Romans. New York: Doubleday (1993), pp. 136, 406, 412.
- For this specific section and themes, compare Gerald O’Collins, Christology: A Biblical, Historical, and Systematic Study of Jesus. Oxford:Oxford University Press, 2009, pp. 24–41.
- As the divine eikōn or image (2 Cor. 4:4), Christ reveals God. The “glory” which becomes visible on the face of Christ is his own glory or, equivalently, “the glory of God” (2 Cor. 4:6). Cf. J.A. Fitzmyer, “Glory Reflected on the Face of Christ and a Palestinian Jewish Motif”, Theological Studies, 42 (1981), pp. 630–44; M. J. Harris, The Second Epistle to the Corinthians, Grand rapids, Mich.: Eerdmans (2005), pp. 330–31.
- For comments on the hymn, cf. M. Barth & H. Blanke, Colossians. New York: Doubleday (1994), pp. 193–251; N. T. Wright, The Climax of the Covenant. Edinburgh: T & T Clark (1991), pp. 99–119.
- Cf. G. O’Collins, Salvation for All, loc. cit..
- The context is decisive for interpreting the nature of the genitive in Colossians 1:15 (“of all creation”). The 1989 Revised English Bible catches clearly the comparative force of the genitive: “his is the primacy over all creation”. The “firstborn from the dead” (Col 1:18) is also the “firstborn over all creation” (Col 1:15).
- On (Phil 2:6–11), see Dunn cit., pp. 113–21. Against Dunn, N. T. Wrightcit., convincingly shows that finding elements of an Adam-Christology in the hymn in no ways means following Dunn by squeezing everything into a purely Adamic pattern and ruling out a Christology of pre-existence and incarnation. For a thorough account of the exegetical and theological issues, cf. N. Capizzi, L’uso di Fil. 2, 6–11 nella cristologia contemporanea (1965–93), Rome: Gregorian University Press (1997).
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia