Assumption of Mary
The Assumption of Mary into Heaven (often shortened to the Assumption) is, according to the beliefs of the Catholic Church, Eastern and Oriental Orthodoxy, the bodily taking up of the Virgin Mary into Heaven at the end of her earthly life.
The Catholic Church teaches as dogma that the Virgin Mary “having completed the course of her earthly life, was assumed body and soul into heavenly glory”. This doctrine was dogmatically defined by Pope Pius XII on 1 November 1950, in the apostolic constitution Munificentissimus Deus by exercising papal infallibility. While the Catholic Church and Eastern Orthodox Church believe in the Dormition of the Theotokos (“the Falling Asleep of the Mother of God”), whether Mary had a physical death has not been dogmatically defined. In Munificentissimus Deus (item 39) Pope Pius XII pointed to the Book of Genesis (3:15) as scriptural support for the dogma in terms of Mary’s victory over sin and death through her intimate association with “the new Adam” (Christ) as also reflected in 1 Corinthians 15:54: “then shall come to pass the saying that is written, Death is swallowed up in victory”.
The New Testament contains no explicit narrative about the death or Dormition, nor of the Assumption of Mary, but several scriptural passages have been theologically interpreted to describe the ultimate fate in this and the afterworld of the Mother of Jesus (see below).
In the churches that observe it, the Assumption is a major feast day, commonly celebrated on 15 August. In many countries, the feast is also marked as a Holy Day of Obligation in the Roman Catholic Church.
History of the belief
The Assumption (Latin: assumptio, “a taking”) was defined as dogma by the Catholic Church in 1950, when Pope Pius XII defined it ex cathedra in his Apostolic Constitution Munificentissimus Deus. The Catholic Church itself interprets chapter 12 of the Book of Revelation as referring to it. The earliest known narrative is the so-called Liber Requiei Mariae (The Book of Mary’s Repose), which survives intact only in an Ethiopic translation. Probably composed by the 4th century, this Christian apocryphal narrative may be as early as the 3rd century. Also quite early are the very different traditions of the “Six Books” Dormition narratives. The earliest versions of this apocryphon are preserved in several Syriac manuscripts of the 5th and 6th centuries, although the text itself probably belongs to the 4th century.
An Armenian letter attributed to Dionysus the Areopagite also mentioned the supposed event, although this was written sometime after the 6th century. John of Damascus, from this period, is the first church authority to advocate the doctrine under his own name. His contemporaries, Gregory of Tours and Modestus of Jerusalem, helped promote the concept to the wider church.
In some versions of the story, the event is said to have taken place in Ephesus, in the House of the Virgin Mary. This is a much more recent and localized tradition. The earliest traditions say that Mary’s life ended in Jerusalem (see “Mary’s Tomb”). By the 7th century, a variation emerged, according to which one of the apostles, often identified as St Thomas, was not present at the death of Mary but his late arrival precipitates a reopening of Mary’s tomb, which is found to be empty except for her grave clothes. In a later tradition, Mary drops her girdle down to the apostle from heaven as testament to the event. This incident is depicted in many later paintings of the Assumption.
Teaching of the Assumption of Mary became widespread across the Christian world, having been celebrated as early as the 5th century and having been established in the East by Emperor Maurice around AD 600. St. John Damascene records the following:
St. Juvenal, Bishop of Jerusalem, at the Council of Chalcedon (451), made known to the Emperor Marcian and Pulcheria, who wished to possess the body of the Mother of God, that Mary died in the presence of all the Apostles, but that her tomb, when opened upon the request of St. Thomas, was found empty; wherefrom the Apostles concluded that the body was taken up to heaven.
The Assumption of Mary was celebrated in the West under Pope Sergius I in the 8th century and Pope Leo IV confirmed the feast as official. Theological debate about the Assumption continued, following the Reformation. But the people celebrated the Assumption as part of the cult of Mary that flourished from the Middle Ages. In 1950 Pope Pius XII defined it as dogma for the Catholic Church. Catholic theologian Ludwig Ottstated, “The idea of the bodily assumption of Mary is first expressed in certain transitus-narratives of the fifth and sixth centuries. … The first Church author to speak of the bodily assumption of Mary, in association with an apocryphal transitus B.M.V., is St. Gregory of Tours.” The Catholic writer Eamon Duffy states that “there is, clearly, no historical evidence whatever for it.” However, the Catholic Church has never asserted nor denied that its teaching is based on the apocryphal accounts. The Church documents are silent on this matter and instead rely upon other sources and arguments as the basis for the doctrine.
Psychologist Carl Jung, who was deeply interested in archetypes and comparative religion, celebrated that the Catholic Church had officially elevated the Virgin Mary (whom he noted as symbolizing the feminine principle) to standing with three masculine figures in the panoply of the church. (Jung: “Answer to Job”)
On 1 November 1950, in the Apostolic Constitution Munificentissimus Deus Pope Pius XII declared the Assumption of Mary as a dogma:
By the authority of our Lord Jesus Christ, of the Blessed Apostles Peter and Paul, and by our own authority, we pronounce, declare, and define it to be a divinely revealed dogma: that the Immaculate Mother of God, the ever Virgin Mary, having completed the course of her earthly life, was assumed body and soul into heavenly glory.
Pope Pius XII deliberately left open the question of whether Mary died before her Assumption.
Before the dogmatic definition, in Deiparae Virginis Mariae Pope Pius XII sought the opinion of Catholic Bishops. A large number of them pointed to the Book of Genesis (3:15) as scriptural support for the dogma. In Munificentissimus Deus (item 39) Pius XII referred to the “struggle against the infernal foe” as in Genesis 3:15 and to “complete victory over the sin and death” as in the Letters of Paul as a scriptural basis for the dogmatic definition, Mary being assumed to heaven as in 1 Corinthians 15:54: “then shall come to pass the saying that is written, Death is swallowed up in victory”.
Ludwig Ott writes in his book, Fundamentals of Catholic Dogma, that “the fact of her death is almost generally accepted by the Fathers and Theologians, and is expressly affirmed in the Liturgy of the Church”, to which he adds a number of helpful citations. He concludes: “for Mary, death, in consequence of her freedom from original sin and from personal sin, was not a consequence of punishment of sin. However, it seems fitting that Mary’s body, which was by nature mortal, should be, in conformity with that of her Divine Son, subject to the general law of death”.
The point of her bodily death has not been infallibly defined by any pope. Many Catholics believe that she did not die at all, but was assumed directly into Heaven. The dogmatic definition within the Apostolic Constitution Munificentissimus Deus which, according to Roman Catholic dogma, infallibly proclaims the doctrine of the Assumption leaves open the question of whether, in connection with her departure, Mary underwent bodily death. It does not dogmatically define the point one way or the other, as shown by the words “having completed the course of her earthly life”.
In Munificentissimus Deus, near the end of the review of the doctrine’s history, Pope Pius XII stated : “All these proofs and considerations of the holy Fathers and the theologians are based upon the Sacred Writings as their ultimate foundation.” Precedent to this, he cited many passages that have been offered in support of this teaching.
The pope cited 1 Corinthians 15. In this passage Paul alludes to Genesis 3:15 (in addition to the primary reference of Psalm 8:6), where it is prophesied that the seed of the woman will crush Satan with his feet: “I will put enmities between thee and the woman, and thy seed and her seed: she shall crush thy head, and thou shalt lie in wait for her heel.” Since, then, Jesus arose to Heaven to fulfill this prophecy, it follows that the woman would have a similar end, since she shared this enmity with Satan.
The pope also mentioned (in paragraph 26) Psalm 132, a psalm commemorating the return of the Ark of God to Jerusalem and lamenting its subsequent loss. The second half of the psalm says that the loss will be recompensed in the New Covenant, and so it is hopefully prayed, “Arise, O Lord, into thy resting place: thou and the ark, which thou hast sanctified” (v. 8). Since the Church sees this New Covenant ark in Mary, it understands that she was taken into Heaven in the same manner as the Lord – that is, body and soul.
Finally, he mentioned in the next paragraph “that woman clothed with the sun [Revelation 12:1–2] whom John the Apostle contemplated on the Island of Patmos” was support for the creating this dogmatic doctrine for Catholics.
Assumption vs. Dormition
Orthodox tradition is clear and unwavering in regard to the central point [of the Dormition]: the Holy Virgin underwent, as did her Son, a physical death, but her body – like His – was afterwards raised from the dead and she was taken up into heaven, in her body as well as in her soul. She has passed beyond death and judgement, and lives wholly in the Age to Come. The Resurrection of the Body … has in her case been anticipated and is already an accomplished fact. That does not mean, however, that she is dissociated from the rest of humanity and placed in a wholly different category: for we all hope to share one day in that same glory of the Resurrection of the Body which she enjoys even now.
Many Catholics also believe that Mary first died before being assumed, but they believe that she was miraculously resurrected before being assumed. Others believe she was assumed bodily into Heaven without first dying. Either understanding may be legitimately held by Catholics, with Eastern Catholics observing the Feast as the Dormition.
Many theologians note by way of comparison that in the Catholic Church, the Assumption is dogmatically defined, while in the Eastern Orthodox tradition, the Dormition is less dogmatically than liturgically and mystically defined. Such differences spring from a larger pattern in the two traditions, wherein Catholic teachings are often dogmatically and authoritatively defined – in part because of the more centralized structure of the Catholic Church – while in Eastern Orthodoxy, many doctrines are less authoritative.
Views differ within Protestantism, with those with a theology closer to Catholicism sometimes believing in a bodily assumption, while most Protestants do not.
Within Anglican doctrine, the Assumption of Mary is either rejected, or regarded as adiaphora (“a thing indifferent”); it therefore disappeared from Anglican worship in 1549, partially returning in some branches of Anglicanism during the 20th century under different names. A Marian feast on 15 August is celebrated by the Church of England as a non-specific feast of the Blessed Virgin Mary, a feast called by the Scottish Episcopal Church simply “Mary the Virgin”, and in the US-based Episcopal Church it is observed as the feast of “Saint Mary the Virgin: Mother of Our Lord Jesus Christ”, while other Anglican provinces have a feast of the Dormition – the Anglican Church of Canada for instance marks the day as the “Falling Asleep of the Blessed Virgin Mary”,
The Anglican-Roman Catholic International Commission, which seeks to identify common ground between the two communions, released in 2004 an non-authoritative declaration meant for study and evaluation, the “Seattle Statement”; this “agreed statement” concludes that “the teaching about Mary in the two definitions of the Assumption and the Immaculate Conception, understood within the biblical pattern of the economy of hope and grace, can be said to be consonant with the teaching of the Scriptures and the ancient common traditions”.
Other Protestant views
Hac causa credimus ut Deiparae virginis Mariae purissimum thalamum et spiritus sancti templum, hoc est, sacrosanctum corpus ejus deportatum esse ab angelis in coelum.
For this reason, we believe that the Virgin Mary, Begetter of God, the most pure bed and temple of the Holy Spirit, that is, her most holy body, was carried to heaven by angels.
Most modern Protestants neither teach nor believe in the Assumption of Mary, as they see no biblical basis or extra-biblical basis for it. Although many churches within Lutheranism do not teach the Assumption of Mary, 15 August remains a Lesser Feast in celebration of “Mary, Mother of Our Lord”, according to the Calendar of Saints.
The present Italian name of the holiday, “Ferragosto”, may derive from the Latin name, Feriae Augusti (“Holidays of the Emperor Augustus”), since the month of August took its name from the emperor. The Solemnity of the Assumption on 15 August was celebrated in the eastern Church from the 6th Century. The Catholic Church adopted this date as a Holy Day of Obligation to commemorate the Assumption of the Blessed Virgin Mary, a reference to the belief in a real, physical elevation of her sinless soul and incorrupt body into Heaven.
It is also a public holiday in parts of Germany (parts of Bavaria and Saarland) and Switzerland (in 14 of the 26 cantons). In Guatemala, it is observed in Guatemala City and in the town of Santa Maria Nebaj, both of which claim her as their patron saint. Also, this day is combined with Mother’s Day in Costa Rica and parts of Belgium.Assumption Day on 15 August is a nationwide public holiday in Andorra, Austria, Belgium, Burundi, Cameroon, Central African Republic, Chile, Republic of Congo, Côte d’Ivoire, Croatia, Colombia, Costa Rica, Cyprus, East Timor, France, Gabon, Greece, Georgia, Republic of Guinea, Haiti, Italy, Lebanon, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Republic of Macedonia, Madagascar, Malta, Mauritius, Republic of Moldova, Monaco, Montenegro (Albanian Catholics), Paraguay, Poland (Polish Army Day), Portugal, Romania, Rwanda, Senegal, Seychelles, Slovenia, Spain, Syria, Tahiti, Togo, and Vanuatu; and was also in Hungary until 1948.
Prominent Catholic and Orthodox countries in which Assumption Day is an important festival but is not recognized by the state as a public holiday include Brazil, Bulgaria, Czech Republic, Ireland, Mexico, the Philippinesand Russia.
In many places, religious parades and popular festivals are held to celebrate this day. In Canada, Assumption Day is the Fête Nationale of the Acadians, of whom she is the patron saint. Some businesses close on that day in heavily francophone parts of New Brunswick, Canada. The Virgin Assumed in Heaven is also patroness of the Maltese Islands and her feast, celebrated on 15 August, apart from being a public holiday in Malta is also celebrated with great solemnity in the local churches especially in the seven localities known as the Seba’ Santa Marijiet. The hamlet of Praha, Texas holds a festival during which its population swells from approximately 25 to 5000 people.
In Anglicanism and Lutheranism, the feast is kept, but without official use of the word “Assumption”. In the Armenian tradition, a cultural custom of blessing of the grapes is annually observed each 12 August in religious commemoration of the Feast of the Dormition of the Theotokos. In Eastern Orthodox churches following the Julian Calendar, the feast day of Assumption of Mary falls on 28 August.
- Episcopal Advance. 99–101. Episcopal Diocese of Chicago. February 1970.
On the fifteenth of August, the Feast of Saint Mary the Virgin, Mother of Our Lord Jesus Christ, the Episcopal Church prays: “O God, you have taken to yourself the blessed Virgin Mary, mother of your incarnate Son: Grant that we, who have been redeemed by his blood, may share with her the glory of your eternal kingdom; through Jesus Christ our Lord, who lives and reigns with you, in the unity of the Holy Spirit, one God, now and for ever. Amen.
- “The Calendar”. Prayerbook.ca. p. ix. Archived from the original on 4 November 2013. Retrieved 3 November 2013.
- Church of England (1907). The Annotated Book of Common Prayer: An Historical, Ritual, and Theological Commentary on the Devotional System of the Church of England. Longmans, Green and Company. p. 159. Retrieved 15 August 2015.
- Pope Pius XII: “Munificentissimus Deus – Defining the Dogma of the Assumption”Archived 4 September 2013 at the Wayback Machine, par. 44. Vatican, 1 November 1950
- Encyclopedia of Catholicism by Frank K. Flinn, J. Gordon Melton 207 ISBN0-8160-5455-X p. 267
- Munificentissimus Deus, 17Archived 4 September 2013 at the Wayback Machine In the liturgical books which deal with the feast either of the dormition or of the Assumption of the Blessed Virgin there are expressions that agree in testifying that, when the Virgin Mother of God passed from this earthly exile to heaven, what happened to her sacred body was, by the decree of divine Providence, in keeping with the dignity of the Mother of the Word Incarnate, and with the other privileges she had been accorded.
- Introduction to Mary by Mark Miravalle (1993) Queenship Pub. Co. ISBN978-1-882972-06-7 pp. 75–78
- Paul Haffner in Mariology: A Guide for Priests, Deacons, seminarians, and Consecrated Persons (2008) ISBN9781579183554 edited by M. Miravalle, pp. 328–350
- Apostolic Constitution Munificentissimus Deusitem 39at the Vatican web siteArchived 4 September 2013 at the Wayback Machine
- “Mary: Grace and Hope in Christ”. Vatican.va. 26 June 2000. Retrieved 3 November 2013.
There is no direct testimony in Scripture concerning the end of Mary’s life. However, certain passages give instances of those who follow God’s purposes faithfully being drawn into God’s presence. Moreover, these passages offer hints or partial analogies that may throw light on the mystery of Mary’s entry into glory.
- Dustin Resch (8 April 2016). Barth’s Interpretation of the Virgin Birth: A Sign of Mystery. Routledge. p. 171. ISBN978-1-317-17611-4.
- Apostolic Constitution, Munificentissimus Deus, para 27, Vaticsn (1950)
- Stephen J. Shoemaker, Ancient Traditions of the Virgin Mary’s Dormition and Assumption
- “Ancient Traditions of the Virgin Mary’s Dormition and Assumption”. Oup.com. 19 October 2006. Retrieved 20 August 2018.
- (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002, 2006). A complete translation of this earliest text appears at pp. 290–350
- ““Six Books” Dormition narratives”(PDF). Archived from the original(PDF) on 24 March 2009. Retrieved 3 November2013.
- William Wright, “The Departure of my Lady Mary from this World,”
- “The Departure of my Lady Mary from this World,”(PDF). Archived from the original(PDF) on 24 March 2009. Retrieved 3 November 2013.
- The Journal of Sacred Literature and Biblical Record, 6 (1865): 417–48 and 7 (1865): 108–60. See also Agnes Smith Lewis, ed., Apocrypha Syriaca, Studia Sinaitica, XI (London: C. J. Clay and Sons, 1902).
- “De Obitu S. Dominae”. Uoregon.edu. Archived from the original on 31 August 2009. Retrieved 3 November 2013.
- “De Transitu Virginis”. Uoregon.edu. Archived from the original on 13 April 2009. Retrieved 3 November 2013.
- Ante-Nicene Fathers – The Writings of the Fathers Down to A.D. 325, vol. 8 page 594
- Butler’s Lives of the Saints by Alban Butler, Paul Burns 1998 ISBN0860122573 pp. 140–141
- More on the Assumption of Mary by Fr. William Saunders, EWTN
- “Apostolic Constitution Munificentissimus Deus, no 44”. Vatican.va. Archived from the original on 4 September 2013. Retrieved 3 November 2013.
- Ludwig Ott, Fundamentals of Catholic Dogma (Rockford: Tan, 1974), pp. 209–210
- Eamon Duffy, What Catholics Believe About Mary (London: Catholic Truth Society, 1989), p. 17
- Apostolic Constitution Munificentissimus Deusitem 44 at the Vatican web siteArchived 4 September 2013 at the Wayback Machine
- According to Catholic dogma, because the Virgin Mary remained an ever-virgin and sinless, the church believed that the Virgin Mary could not suffer the consequences of Original Sin, which is death. Nicea II Session 6 Decree
- “Nicaea II Definition, “without blemish““. Ewtn.com. Retrieved 3 November 2013.
- Ludwig Ott’s Fundamentals of Catholic Dogma, pp. 250 ff.
- Fundamentals of Catholic Dogma, Ludwig Ott, Book III, Pt. 3, Ch. 2, §6, ISBN0-89555-009-1
- Bishop Kallistos (Ware) of Diokleia, in: Festal Menaion [London: Faber and Faber, 1969], p. 64.
- The Catholicism Answer Book: The 300 Most Frequently Asked Questions by John Trigilio, Kenneth Brighenti 2007 ISBN1-4022-0806-5 p. 64
- The Ancient Traditions of the Virgin Mary’s Dormition and Assumption by Stephen J. Shoemaker 2006 ISBN0-19-921074-8 p. 201
- See “Three Sermons on the Dormition of the Virgin” by John of Damascus, from the Medieval Sourcebook
- Williams, Paul (2007). pp. 238, 251, quote: “Where Anglican writers discuss the doctrine of the Assumption, it is either rejected or held to be of the adiaphora.”
- Williams, Paul (2007). p. 253, incl. note 54.
- The Church of England, official website: The Calendar. Accessed 17 July 2018
- The Scottish Episcopal Church, official website: Calendar and Lectionary. Accessed 17 July 2018
- The Episcopal Church. “Saint Mary the Virgin: Mother of Our Lord Jesus Christ”. Liturgical Calendar. New York: The Domestic and Foreign Missionary Society, The Episcopal Church. Retrieved 17 July 2018.
- De origine erroris libri duo (On the Origin of Error, Two Books) . “In the De origine erroris in divorum ac simulachrorum cultu he opposed the worship of the saints and iconolatry; in the De origine erroris in negocio Eucharistiae ac Missae he strove to show that the Catholic conceptions of the Eucharist and of celebrating the Mass were wrong. Bullinger published a combined edition of these works in 4 ° (Zurich 1539), which was divided into two books, according to themes of the original work.” The Library of the Finnish nobleman, royal secretary and trustee Henrik Matsson (c. 1540–1617), Terhi Kiiskinen Helsinki: Academia Scientarium Fennica (Finnish Academy of Science), 2003, ISBN951-41-0944-9, 9789514109447, p. 175 
- Froschauer. De origine erroris, Caput XVI (Chapter 16), p. 70
- The Thousand Faces of the Virgin Mary (1996), George H. Tavard, Liturgical Press ISBN0-8146-5914-4, 9780814659144, p. 109. 
- “Mary, Mother of Our Lord”. Liturgybytlw.com. Retrieved 3 November 2013.
- “St. Mary, Mother of Our Lord”. Wmltblog.org. 15 August 2011. Retrieved 3 November 2013.
- Pianigiani, Ottorino (1907). “Vocabolario etimologico della lingua italiana”.
- Columbus World Travel Guide, 25th Edition
- Reiland, Catherine. “To Heaven Through the Streets of Guatemala City: the Processions of the Virgin of the Assumption”, Emisferica
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia