Druidry, sometimes termed Druidism, is a modern spiritual or religious movement that generally promotes harmony, connection, and reverence for the natural world. This commonly is extended to include respect for all beings, including the environment itself. Many forms of modern Druidry are modern Pagan religions, although most of the earliest modern Druids identified as Christians. Originating in Britain during the 18th century, Druidry was originally a cultural movement, only gaining religious or spiritual connotations in the 19th century.
The core principle of Druidry is respect and veneration of nature, and as such it often involves participation in the environmental movement. Another prominent belief among modern Druids is the veneration of ancestors, particularly those who belonged to prehistoric societies.
Arising from the 18th century Romanticist movement in Britain, which glorified the ancient Celtic peoples of the Iron Age, the early neo-Druids aimed to imitate the Iron Age priests who were also known as druids. At the time, little accurate information was known about these ancient priests, and the modern Druidic movement has no direct connection to them, despite contrary claims made by some modern Druids.
In the late 18th century, modern Druids developed fraternal organizations modeled on Freemasonry that employed the romantic figure of the British Druids and Bards as symbols of the indigenous spirituality of Prehistoric Britain. Some of these groups were purely fraternal and cultural, creating traditions from the national imagination of Britain. Others, in the early 20th century, merged with contemporary movements such as the physical culture movement and naturism. Since the 1980s, some modern druid groups have adopted similar methodologies to those of Celtic Reconstructionist Paganism in an effort to create a more historically accurate practice. However, there is still controversy over how much resemblance modern Druidism may or may not have to the Iron Age druids.
Some 18th century sources like Iolo Morganwg fabricated what he claimed were early Welsh literary sources and traditions that supposedly dated to the prehistoric Druids. Gorsedd, one of the 18th century traditions that were founded by Morganwg, became part of the 12th century Eisteddfod festival. The concerns of modern Druidry—which include healing the planet and seeking connections with the natural world—are likely very different from those of the Iron Age societies in which the original druids lived. Other 18th century fabrications like the Fragments of Ancient Poetry published by James Macpherson between 1760 and 1763. The poems were hugely popular; they were read by many of the notable figures of the period, including Voltaire, Napoleon and Thomas Jefferson, and quality of the poetry inspired contemporary comparisons with Homer. Though attributed to the ancient semi-legendary poet Ossian, the works are believed to have been composed by a wistful Macpherson seeking to recreate the oral traditions of Scotland.
Everything presently known about the Iron Age druids derives from archaeological evidence and Greco-Roman textual sources, rather than material produced by these druids themselves.Due to the scarcity of knowledge about the Iron Age druids, their belief system cannot be accurately reconstructed. Some Druids incorporate everything that is known about Iron Age druids into their practices. However, as noted by scholar of religion Jenny Butler, the historical realities of Iron Age religion are often overlooked by Druids in favour of “a highly romanticised version”.
Many Druids believe that the practices of the Iron Age druids should be revived yet modified to meet current needs. In Ireland, some Druids have claimed that because the island was never conquered by the Roman Empire, here the Iron Age druids survived and their teachings were passed down hereditarily until modern times, at which modern Druids can reclaim them. Some Druids claim that they can channel information about the Iron Age druids.
Druidry has been described as a religion, a new religious movement, a “spiritual movement”, and as a nature religion. It has been described as a form of contemporary Paganism, and on the contemporary Pagan spectrum between reconstructionism and eclecticism, Druidry sits on the latter end. Various Druidic groups also display New Age and neo-shamanic influences. The Druidic community has been characterised as a neo-tribe, for it is disembedded and its membership is elective. Druidry has been described as a form of Celtic spirituality, or “Celtic-Based Spirituality”. Scholar of religion Marion Bowman described Druidry as the “Celtic spirituality” par excellence. Some practitioners regard Druidry as a form of “native spirituality”, and it displays an affinity with folk religions.In defining Druidry as a “native spirituality”, some Druids seek to draw elements from other native religions, such as the belief systems of Australian Aboriginal and Native American communities. Practitioners differ in the levels of formality and seriousness that they bring to their adherence. Some groups use the word Druid for both male and female practitioners, eschewing the term Druidess for female followers.
Some Druids identify as Pagan, others as Christian. Some practitioners merge Pagan and Christian elements in their own personal practice, in at least one case identifying as a “Christodruid”. Other practitioners adopt additional elements; for instance there are self-described “Zen Druids” and “Hasidic Druids”. The Berengia Order of Druids drew upon elements from science fiction television shows like Star Trek and Babylon 5.
The earliest modern Druids aligned themselves with Christianity. Some writers like William Stukeley regarded the Iron Age druids as proto-Christians who were monotheists worshiping the Christian God. In a similar vein, some modern Druids believe that ancient druidic wisdom was preserved through a distinct Celtic Christianity. Over the course of the twentieth century, and particularly since the early 1960s, Druidry increasingly came to be associated with the modern Pagan movement.
Druidry also draws upon the legends surrounding King Arthur. One of the clearest links between Arthuriana and Druidry is through the Loyal Arthurian Warband, a Druidic group that employs Arthurian symbolism as part of its environmental campaigns.
Druidry has been described as a nature venerating movement. Druidry conceives of the natural world as being imbued with spirit, and thus regard it as alive and dynamic. Because they view the natural world as sacred, many Druids are involved in environmentalism, thereby acting to protect areas of the natural landscape that are under threat from development or pollution.
Druids are generally critical of mainstream society, regarding it as being “governed by consumerism, environmental exploitation and the supremacy of technology.” In contrast to this, Druids seek to establish a way of living that they regard as being more “natural”. Through seeking a connection with nature, Druids pursue a sense of “cosmic belonging”.
“Grant O Goddess, thy protection
and in protection, strength
and in strength, understanding
and in understanding, knowledge
and in knowledge, the knowledge of justice
and in the knowledge of justice, the love of it
and in the love of it, the love of all existences
and in the love of all existences, the love of Goddess and all Goodness”
“The Druid’s Prayer”, after Iolo Morganwg.
By the end of the 19th century, Druidry was described as a “monotheistic philosophical tradition”. Druidry is now often described as polytheistic, although there is no set pantheon of deities to which all Druids adhere. Emphasis is however placed on the idea that these deities predate Christianity. These deities are usually regarded as being immanent rather than transcendent. Some practitioners express the view that the real existence of these deities is less important to them than the impact that said belief has on their lives.
With the increase in polytheistic Druidry, and the widespread acceptance of Goddess worship, “The Druid’s Prayer”, which had been originally written in the 18th century by Druid Iolo Morganwg and emphasises the unity of the supreme Deity, had the word “God” replaced with “Goddess” in common usage.
Some Druids regard it as possible to communicate with various spirits during ritual. Certain Druids in Ireland have for instance adopted belief in the Sí, spirits from Irish folklore, into their Druidic system, interpreting them as elementals. They have adopted the folkloric belief that such spirits are repelled by iron and thus avoid bringing iron to their rituals, so as not to scare spirits away.
Awen is a concept of spirit or divinity in Druidry, which inspires poetry and art, and is believed to be a “flowing spirit” given by the Deity, which can be invoked by the Druid. In many Druidic rituals, Awen is invoked by either chanting the word “Awen” or “A-I-O” three times, in order to shift the consciousness of the participants involved. The word “Awen” derives from the Welsh and Cornish terms for “inspiration”.
A connection with ancestors is important in Druidry. In some recorded examples, Druids regard the “ancestors” as an amorphous group, rather than as a set of named individuals. The Druidic concept of ancestry is that of “ancestors of the land”, rather than the “ancestors of the blood” venerated by some Heathen groups; they perceive a spiritual connection, rather than a genetic one, as being important. Emphasising ancestors gives practitioners a sense of an identity which has been passed down from the past over the course of many centuries.
Ancestor veneration leads many to object to the archaeological excavation of human remains and their subsequent display in museums. Many have organised campaigns for their reburial. For instance, in 2006, a neo-Druid called Paul Davies requested that the Alexander Keiller Museum in Avebury, Wiltshire rebury their human remains, and that storing and displaying them was “immoral and disrespectful”. Criticism of this view has come from the archaeological community, with statements like “no single modern ethnic group or cult should be allowed to appropriate our ancestors for their own agendas. It is for the international scientific community to curate such remains.”
Rites and practices
Druidic groups are usually known as groves. Such a term reflects the movement’s association with trees, and references the idea that Iron Age druids performed their rituals within tree groves. Larger Druidic organisations are usually termed orders, and those that lead them are often termed chosen chiefs.
Some British Druid orders divide membership into three grades, referred to as “bards”, “ovates”, and then “Druids”. This three-tier system mirrors the three degrees found in British Traditional Wicca. Other groups eschew any division into bard, ovate, and druid. OBOD primarily educates its members in its form of Druidry through a correspondence course.
Druidic rituals often involve the participants standing in a circle and begin with a “calling of the quarters”, in which a participant draws a circle in the air in a deosil direction to hail the north, south, east, and west, marking out the space in which the ceremony will take place. Libations may be poured onto the ground while a chalice of drink is passed around the assembled participants, again in a deosil direction. Food, often in the form of bread or cake, is also passed around the Druids and consumed. This may be followed by a period of meditation among those assembled. A form of earth energy is then visualised, with participants believing that it is sent for a designated healing purpose. This may be designed to help the victims of a particular event, such as a war or an epidemic, or it might be directed to assist individuals known to the group who are ill or requiring emotional support. After the end of the ceremony, the Druids may remain together to take part in a meal, or visit a nearby pub.
There is no specific dress code for ritual within the Druidic movement; some participants wear ordinary clothes, others wear robes. Some groups favour earth-coloured robes, believing that this links them to the natural world and that it aids them in traveling unnoticed when going about at night. “Celtish” language is often employed during ceremonies, as are quotations and material from the Carmina Gadelica. Most use some form of Morganwg’s Gorsedd Prayer.
Some Druids also involve themselves in spell-casting, although this is usually regarded as a secondary feature among their practices.
Locations for ritual
Rituals commonly take place at formations in the natural landscape or at prehistoric sites, among them megalithic constructions from the Neolithic and Bronze Age or earthworks from the Iron Age. Druids often believe that, even if the Iron Age druids did not build these monuments, they did use them for their rites. Performing rituals at said sites allows many Druids to feel that they are getting close to their ancestors. Druids regard them as sacred sites in part as recognition that prehistoric societies would have done the same. Druids in various parts of Ireland and Britain have reported such sites being home to a “Spirit of the Place” residing there. Many Druids also believe that such sites are centres of earth energy and lie along ley lines in the landscape. These are ideas that have been adopted from Earth mysteries writers like John Michell.
Attitudes to land and environmental conservation are important to the Druidic world-view. In 2003, Druids performed a ritual at the Hill of Tara to heal the location after road construction took place in the adjacent landscape. Others have carried out rituals at Coldrum Long Barrow to oppose fracking in the landscape. Druids have also involved themselves in tree planting projects.
In the 1990s and early 2000s, the use of a ritual based on the sweat lodge became increasingly popular among some Neo-druids in Ireland and the U.K. Some Druids regard these sweat lodges as “initiatory and regenerative opportunities to rededicate oneself to honouring the Earth and the community of life.” This practice is regarded differently by different individuals. Some practitioners regard it as a “revival” of genuine pre-Christian druidic practices, others see it a creative and respectful borrowing from one “native spirituality” into another, and a third school of thought regards it as a form of cultural theft. Native Americans who preserve the sweat lodge ceremonies for their communities have protested the appropriation of the ceremony by non-Natives, increasingly so now that people have been injured, and some have died, in fraudulent sweat lodge ceremonies performed by non-Natives.
Arts and poetry
Storytelling is important within Druidry, with stories chosen often coming from the vernacular literature of linguistically Celtic countries or from Arthurian legend. Musical performances typically draw from the folk musical traditions of Ireland, Scotland, England, France, and Brittany. Instruments used commonly include lap harps, mandolins, whistles, bag pipes, and guitars. Bards utilise archaic words such as “t’was”, “thence”, and “deeds”, while speaking in a grandiose manner of intonation. The general purpose of bardism, according to scholar of religion and bard Andy Letcher, is to create an “ambience” of “a catchall ahistorical past; a Celtic, medieval, Tolkienesque, once-upon-a-time enchanted world”. Instruments commonly used by Druidic Bards include acoustic stringed instruments like the guitar and the clarsach, as well as the bodhran, bagpipe, rattle, flute and whistle. The scholar of religion Graham Harvey believed that these specific instruments were preferred by modern Druids because many of them were Irish in origin, and therefore gave a “Celtic flavour, seemingly invoking the Iron Age”, the period during which the ancient druids lived.
Groups like the British Druid Order have established their own gorseddau. Unlike the Welsh cultural gorseddau, these Druidic events often allow anyone to perform as a bard if they are inspired to do so.
Druids have participated in other musical genres and with more technological instruments, including the blues and rave music, and one British club, Megatripolis, opened with the performance of a Druidic ritual.
Many Druids engage in a range of healing therapies, with both herbalism and homeopathy being popular within the Druidic community.
Druids often revive older folk customs for use on their practices. The England-based Secular Order of Druids for instance possess a hobby horse based on that used in the ‘Obby ‘Oss festival of Padstow, Cornwall.
Druids generally observe eight spiritual festivals annually, which are collectively known as the Wheel of the Year. These are the same festivals usually celebrated by Wiccans. In some cases groups attempt to revive folkloric European festivals and their accompanying traditions. In other cases the rites are modern inventions, inspired by “the spirit of what they believe was the religious practice of pre-Roman Britain.” For reasons of practicality, such celebrations are not always held on the specific date of the festival itself, but on the nearest weekend, thus maximising the number of participants who can attend.
Four of these are solar festivals, being positioned at the solstices and equinoxes; these are largely inspired by Germanic paganism. The other four are the “Celtic” festivals, the crossquarter days inspired by modern interpretations of ancient Celtic polytheism. The idea of the Wheel of the Year was introduced into Druidry by Ross Nichols, who founded the Order of Bards, Ovates and Druids in 1964, and he had gained this idea from his friend Gerald Gardner, who had implemented it in his Bricket Wood coven of Gardnerian Witches in 1958.
|Festival||Northern Hemisphere||Southern Hemisphere||Historical Origins||Associations|
|Samhain, Calan Gaeaf||31 October||30 April, or 1 May||Celtic polytheism (see also Celts)||Beginning of winter.|
|Winter Solstice, Alban Arthan||21 or 22 December||21 June||Germanic paganism||Winter Solstice and the rebirth of the sun.|
|Imbolc||1 or 2 February||1 August||Celtic polytheism||First signs of spring.|
|Spring Equinox, Alban Eilir||20 or 21 March||21 or 22 September||Germanic paganism||Spring Equinox and the beginning of spring.|
|Beltaine, Calan Mai||30 April or 1 May||1 November||Celtic polytheism||Beginning of summer.|
|Summer Solstice, Alban Hefin||21 or 22 June||21 December||Possibly Neolithic||Summer Solstice.|
|Lughnasadh||1 or 2 August||1 February||Celtic polytheism||Beginning of Harvest Season|
|Autumn Equinox, Alban Elfed||21 or 22 September||20 March||No historical pagan equivalent.||Autumn Equinox. The harvest & harvest of fruit.|
The image of the Iron Age druids as national heroes would later begin to emerge in England during the Early Modern period, with the antiquarian and Anglican vicar William Stukeley (1687–1765) proclaiming himself to be a “druid” and writing a number of popular books in which he claimed that prehistoric megaliths like Stonehenge and Avebury were temples built by the druids, something now known to be incorrect. Stukeley himself, being a devout but unorthodox Christian, felt that the ancient druids had been followers of a monotheistic faith very similar to Christianity, at one point even stating that ancient druidry was “so extremely like Christianity, that in effect, it differed from it only in this; they believe in a Messiah who was to come into the world, as we believe in him that is come”.
Soon after the publication and spread of Stukeley’s writings, other people also began to self-describe themselves as “druids” and form societies: the earliest of these was the Druidic Society, founded on the Welsh island of Anglesey in 1772. Largely revolving around ensuring the continued financial success of business on the island, it attracted many of Anglesey’s wealthy inhabitants into it, and donated much of its proceeds to charity, but was disbanded in 1844. A similar Welsh group was the Society of the Druids of Cardigan, founded circa 1779, largely by a group of friends who wished to attend “literary picnics” together. The third British group to call itself Druidic was English rather than Welsh, and was known as the Ancient Order of Druids. Founded in 1781 and influenced by Freemasonry, its origins have remained somewhat unknown, but it subsequently spread in popularity from its base in London across much of Britain and even abroad, with new lodges being founded, all of which were under the control of the central Grand Lodge in London. The Order was not religious in structure, and instead acted as somewhat of a social club, particularly for men with a common interest in music. In 1833 it suffered a schism, as a large number of dissenting lodges, unhappy at the management of the Order, formed their own United Ancient Order of Druids, and both groups would go on to grow in popularity throughout the rest of the century.
Development of religious Druidry
None of the earliest modern Druidic groups had been religious in structure; however, this was to change in the late 18th century, primarily because of the work of a Welshman who took the name of Iolo Morganwg (1747–1826). Born as Edward Williams, he would take up the cause of Welsh nationalism, and was deeply opposed to the British monarchy, supporting many of the ideals of the French revolution, which had occurred in 1789. Eventually moving to London, he began perpetuating the claim that he was actually one of the last initiates of a surviving group of druids who were descended from those found in the Iron Age, centred on his home county of Glamorgan. He subsequently organised the performing of Neo-druidic rituals on Primrose Hill with some of his followers, whom he categorised as either Bards or Ovates, with he himself being the only one actually categorised as a Druid. He himself practiced a form of religion he believed the ancient druids had, which involved the worship of a singular monotheistic deity as well as the acceptance of reincarnation. In Wales, Druidry had taken on an explicitly religious formation by the 1840s.
In 1874, Robert Wentworth Little, a Freemason who achieved notoriety as the first Supreme Magus of the occult Societas Rosicruciana, allegedly founded the Ancient and Archaeological Order of Druids, which, like the Societas Rosicruciana, was an esoteric organisation. Meanwhile, at the start of the 20th century, Druidic groups began holding their ceremonies at the great megalithic monument of Stonehenge in Wiltshire, England: the historian Ronald Hutton would later remark that “it was a great, and potentially uncomfortable, irony that modern Druids had arrived at Stonehenge just as archaeologists were evicting the ancient Druids from it” as they realised that the structure dated from the Neolithic and early Bronze Age, millennia before the Iron Age, when the druids first appear in the historical record.
One member of the Ancient Order of Druids was the English Gerald Gardner, who later established Gardnerian Wicca.
Pagan Druidry in Europe
The most important figure for the rise of Neopagan Druidry in Britain was Ross Nichols. A member of The Druid Order, in 1964 he split off to found the Order of Bards, Ovates and Druids(OBOD). In 1988 Philip Carr-Gomm was asked to lead the Order.
Nichols drew upon ideas from the Earth mysteries movement, incorporating many of its ideas about Glastonbury into his interpretation of Druidry.
Between 1985 and 1988, the Druid Tim Sebastion campaigned for religious access to Stonehenge, forming the Secular Order of Druids (SOD) around him. In the late 1980s, SOD’s campaign was joined by another group focused on Stonehenge access, led by a Druid calling himself King Arthur Pendragon; by 1993, his group had formalised as the Loyal Arthurian Warband. In 1988, a Druid order was also established in Glastonbury, Somerset, under the leadership of Rollo Maughfling. In the late 1970s, the former Alexandrian Wiccan high priest Philip Shallcrass established the British Druid Order (BDO) to create a more explicitly Pagan form of Druidry. Fellow Druid Emma Restall Orr became co-leader of the group in the mid-1990s. Feeling the system of Orders too limiting, in 2002 Orr created The Druid Network, which was officially launched in 2003.
The early 1990s were—according to the historian Ronald Hutton—”boom years” for British Druidry. In 1989, the Council of British Druid Orders was established to co-ordinate the activities of different Druid groups at the national level. Further reflecting this spirit of unity, in 1992 a rite took place on London’s Primrose Hill in which various Druid orders participated. That year, two new Druidic magazines began publication Shallcrass’ Druid’s Voice and Steve Wilson’s Aisling. However, arguments between different groups persisted and in 1996, the AOD, OBOD, and BDO withdrew from the Council of British Druid Orders. In the late 1990s, English Heritage relented to pressure and agreed to allow Druidic and greater public access to Stonehenge. During the 1990s, Pagan Druidic groups were also established in Italy, with British Druids like Carr-Gomm visiting the country to give talks to the Pagan community.
A number of well established Druidic groups operate elsewhere in Europe. For example, the Celtic Druid Temple (Ireland), Assembleia da Tradição Druídica Lusitana (Portugal), Orden Druida Fintan (Catalonia) or Irmandade Druídica Galaica (Galicia and Northern Portugal) are legally registered in their respective countries, hence Druidry being an officially recognised religion in those territories. Groups such as ODF, IDG and ATDL differ from other Druidic orders as they do observe dogma and stricter core tenets in their approach to Druidry.
Druidry in North America
The earliest American Druid organizations were fraternal orders such as the United Ancient Order of Druids and the American Order of Druids. The former was a branch of a British organization that had split from the Ancient Order of Druids, while the latter was founded in Massachusetts in 1888. Both were forms of fraternal benefit societies rather than religious or neo-pagan groups.
In 1963, the Reformed Druids of North America (RDNA) was founded by students at Carleton College, Northfield, Minnesota, a liberal arts college that required its members to attend some form of religious services. As a form of humorous protest against this rule, a group of students, who contained Christians, Jews and agnostics within their ranks, decided to create their own, non-serious religious group. Their protest was successful, and the requirement was scrapped in 1964. Nonetheless, the group continued holding services, which were not considered Neopagan by most members, but instead thought of an inter-religious nature. From its beginning, the RDNA revolved around the veneration of the natural world, personified as Mother Earth, holding that religious truth could be found through nature. They had also adopted other elements of Neopaganism into their practices, for instance celebrating the festivals of the Wheel of the Year, which they had borrowed from the Neopagan religion of Wicca.
While the RDNA had become a success, with new branches or “groves” being founded around the United States, the many Neopagan elements of the RDNA eventually rose to prominence, leading several groves to actively describe themselves as Neopagan. This was opposed by several of the group’s founders, who wanted it to retain its inter-religious origins, and certain groves actually emphasized their connection to other religions: there was a group of Zen Druids in Olympia and Hassidic Druids in St. Louis for instance. Among those largely responsible for this transition towards Neopaganism within the organisation were Isaac Bonewits and Robert Larson, who worked in a grove located in Berkeley, California. Believing that the Reformed Druidic movement would have to accept that it was essentially Neopagan in nature, Bonewits decided to found a split-off group known as the New Reformed Druids of North America (NRDNA), which he defined as an “Eclectic Reconstructionist Neo-Pagan Priestcraft, based primarily upon Gaulish and Celtic sources”.
Bonewits still felt that many in the RDNA were hostile towards him, believing that he had infiltrated their group, and so in 1985 he founded a new, explicitly Neopagan Druidic group, Ár nDraíocht Féin (Our Own Druidism; a.k.a. ADF) and began publishing a journal, The Druid’s Progress. Arguing that it should draw from pan-European sources, rather than just those that were considered “Celtic”, he placed an emphasis on academic and scholarly accuracy, taking a stand against what he perceived as the prevalent pseudo-historical ideas of many Neopagans and Druids. In 1986, several members of Ár nDraíocht Féin openly criticized Bonewits for his pan-European approach, wishing modern Druidism to be inspired purely by Celtic sources, and so they splintered off to form a group called the Henge of Keltria.
The Ancient Order of Druids in America (AODA), currently headed by Pagan author and druid John Michael Greer, was founded as the Ancient Order of Masonic Druids in America in 1912 in Boston, Mass. The founder, James Manchester had obtained a charter from the Ancient Order of Masonic Druids of England (AOMD). AOMD started in 1874 as the Ancient Archaeological Order of Druids (AAOD) by Robert Wentworth Little, the founder of Societas Rosicruciana in Anglia (SRIA). SRIA is the immediate predecessor organization of the Hermetic Order of the Golden Dawn (HOGD). In 1972, the Ancient Order of Masonic Druids in America changed its name to the current name the Ancient Order of Druids in America and started initiating women, which it had not done so previously because of its masonic origin. It was also at this time that AOMD denied ever having recognized AOMDA and wasn’t interested in doing so at that time.
According to the American Religious Identification Survey (ARIS), there are approximately 30,000 Druids in the United States. In August 2007, the AFD claimed 1177 members, spread over 61 groves. Scholar of religion Michael T. Cooper found that, among 57 ADF members, 37% had previously been Christian, and that a common theme among participants in the group was disillusionment with Christianity, a religion that they regard as an oppressive force which has subordinated women and damaged the environment.
The Pagan Census project led by Helen A. Berger, Evan A. Leach, and Leigh S. Shaffer gained responses from Druids in the U.S. Of these respondents, 49.7% were male and 48.2% female (2% did not answer), which reflected a greater proportion of men than the American Pagan community as a whole, which had a female majority. 73.6% of Druid respondents described themselves as heterosexual, with 16.2% as bisexual, 3% as gay men and 1.5% as lesbian. This reflected a greater proportion of heterosexuals than in the broader American Pagan community. The median income of these Druids was between $20,000 and $30,000, which was lower than the average for Pagans. They project revealed that 83.8% of Druid respondents were registered to vote, which was lower than the proportion across the broader Pagan community (87.8%). Among these Druids, 35.5% were registered independents, 31% Democrats, 5.1% Libertarians, 4.6% Republicans, and 3.6% Greens.
The historian Ronald Hutton estimated that, in 1996, there were approximately 6000 members of Druid groups in England, two-thirds of whom were OBOD members. The 2001 UK Census, 30,569 individuals described themselves as “Druids” and 508 as “Celtic Druids”. In September 2010, the Charity Commission for England and Wales agreed to register The Druid Network as a charity, effectively giving it official recognition as a religion. A study of 75 members of the UK-based Order of Bards, Ovates and Druids found “a clear preference for introversion (61%) over extraversion (39%), a clear preference for intuition (64%) over sensing (36%), a clear preference for feeling (56%) over thinking (44%), and a clear preference for judging (68%) over perceiving (32%).”
- “The Druids”. The British Museum. Archived from the original on 23 December 2012. Retrieved 1 December 2014.
Modern Druids have no direct connection to the Druids of the Iron Age. Many of our popular ideas about the Druids are based on the misunderstandings and misconceptions of scholars 200 years ago. These ideas have been superseded by later study and discoveries.
- Doyle White 2016, p. 351.
- Butler 2005, p. 94; Doyle White 2016, p. 351.
- Butler 2005, p. 88.
- Cunliffe 2010.
- Butler 2005, p. 96.
- Cooper 2009b, pp. 41–42.
- Butler 2005, pp. 94–95.
- Butler 2005, p. 97.
- Butler 2005, p. 91.
- Butler 2005, p. 92.
- Bowman 2002, p. 93.
- Cooper 2009, p. 59.
- Cooper 2009, p. 60.
- Gieser 2016, p. 55.
- Doyle White 2016, p. 348.
- Anczyk 2015, p. 20.
- Letcher 2004, p. 25.
- Bowman 2002, p. 78.
- Butler 2005, p. 87.
- Bowman 2002, p. 83.
- Bowman 2002, p. 82.
- Butler 2005, p. 103.
- Hale 2000, p. 189; Bowman 2002, p. 79.
- Bowman 2002, p. 79.
- Hale 2000, p. 189.
- Bowman 2002, p. 82; Butler 2005, p. 88.
- Cooper 2009, p. 63.
- Hale 2000, p. 188.
- Bowman 2002, p. 85.
- Bowman 2002, pp. 85–86.
- Hale 2000, pp. 188–189.
- Harvey 2007, p. 30.
- Hale 2000, p. 193.
- Gieser 2016, p. 63.
- Harvey 2007, pp. 31–32.
- Gieser 2016, p. 62.
- Cooper 2009, p. 68.
- Harvey 2007. p. 34.
- Cooper 2009, p. 70.
- Cooper 2009, p. 69.
- Butler 2005, p. 105.
- Butler 2005, p. 104.
- Harvey 2007, p. 20.
- Harvey 2007, p. 21.
- Cooper 2009, p. 71.
- Doyle White 2016, p. 355.
- “Consultation on ancient human remains ends Jan 31”. British Archaeology (104). 2009.
- “Letters: Human Remains”. British Archaeology (105). 2009.
- Butler 2005, p. 90; Harvey 2007, p. 29.
- Butler 2005, p. 90.
- Harvey 2007, p. 29.
- Harvey 2007, p. 32.
- Letcher 2004, p. 24; Harvey 2007, p. 32.
- Letcher 2004, p. 24.
- Harvey 2007, pp. 19–20.
- Anczyk 2015, p. 17.
- Bowman 2002, p. 81; Harvey 2007, p. 20.
- Bowman 2002, p. 81.
- Butler 2005, p. 109; Doyle White 2016, pp. 361–362.
- Butler 2005, pp. 109–110; Doyle White 2016, p. 362.
- Butler 2005, p. 110.
- Butler 2005, p. 112.
- Butler 2005, p. 111.
- Doyle White 2016, p. 362.
- Butler 2005, p. 93.
- Butler 2005, p. 98.
- Doyle White 2016, p. 358.
- Doyle White 2016, p. 356.
- Doyle White 2016, p. 357.
- Bowman 2002, p. 80.
- Butler 2005, p. 106.
- Gieser 2016, pp. 60–61, 64, 67.
- Doyle White 2016, p. 349.
- Butler 2005, p. 95.
- Hale 2000, p. 192.
- Doyle White 2016, p. 360.
- Doyle White 2016, p. 363.
- Butler 2005, p. 114.
- Doyle White 2016, p. 368.
- Butler 2005, pp. 121–122.
- Bowman 2002, p. 83; Harvey 2007, pp. 26–27.
- Harvey 2007, pp. 26–27.
- Taliman, Valerie (13 October 2009), Selling the sacred, Indian Country Today
- Herel, Suzanne (27 June 2002). “2 seeking spiritual enlightenment die in new-age sweat lodge”. San Francisco Chronicle. Hearst Communications. Retrieved 26 September 2006.
- Goulais, Bob (24 October 2009). “Editorial: Dying to experience native ceremonies”. North Bay Nugget. Archived from the original on 6 September 2012. Retrieved 7 August 2014.
- Hocker, Lindsay. “Sweat lodge incident ‘not our Indian way'”, Quad-Cities Online, 14 October 2009.
- Letcher 2004, pp. 16–17; Harvey 2007, p. 22.
- Letcher 2004, p. 16.
- Harvey 2007, p. 22.
- Letcher 2004, p. 17.
- Butler 2005, p. 121.
- Harvey 2007, pp. 23–24.
- Harvey 2007, p. 25.
- Harvey 2007, p. 26.
- Harvey 2007, p. 203.
- Harvey 2007, p. 23.
- Bowman 2002, p. 81; Butler 2005, p. 108; Cooper 2009, p. 66.
- Cooper 2009, p. 66.
- Gallagher, Eugene V.; Ashcraft, W. Michael (2006). Introduction to new and alternative religions in America. Westport, Conn.: Greenwood Press. p. 178. ISBN978-0-275-98713-8.
- Hutton 2009. pp. 49–55.
- Hutton 2009. pp. 86–102.
- Hutton 2009. pp. 130–131.
- Hutton 2009. pp. 131–132.
- Hutton 2009. pp. 132–143.
- Hutton 2009. pp. 146–182.
- Hutton 2009b, p. 314.
- Hutton 2009. pp. 253–286.
- Hutton 2009. p. 343.
- Hutton 2009. p. 323.
- Lewis 2009, p. 480.
- Hutton 2009b, p. 324.
- Hutton 2003, p. 250.
- Hutton 2003, pp. 252–253.
- Hutton 2003, pp. 251–252.
- Shallcrass 2002, p. 83; Hutton 2003, p. 249.
- interview (Avalonia)[permanent dead link].
- Hutton 2003, p. 255.
- Hutton 2003, p. 256.
- Hutton 2003, p. 254.
- Howell 2015, pp. 272–273.
- CDT: Detail of registration with the Charities Regulator (Government of Ireland). Retrieved 4 January 2019.
- ATDL: Detail of registration with the Registo Nacional de Pessoas Colectivas
- ODF: Detail of registration with the Spanish Ministry of Justice. Retrieved 4 January 2019.
- ODF: Detail of registration with the Municipality of Vacarisses (Catalonia). Retrieved 4 January 2019.
- IDG: Detail of registration with the Spanish Ministry of Justice. Retrieved 4 January 2019.
- IDG: Detail of registration with the (Galician) Cultural Heritage Network. Retrieved 4 January 2019.
- Conticannatios. “Druidismo – Religión y Ortodoxia”. Revista da Tradição Lusitana – ATDL, no. 2, pp. 84-94, May 2017. Available online on ODF’s website.
- Milésio. “Druids and Druidry in the 21st Century”. Revista da Tradição Lusitana – ATDL, no. 3, pp. 66-74, November 2017. Available online on IDG’s website (pdf).
- Adgnatios. “Druidade: pelos Reinos Interiores de uma Alma Amanhecente”. Revista da Tradição Lusitana – ATDL, no. 3, pp. 15-23, November 2017. Available online on ATDL’s website.
- Alvin J. Schmidt Fraternal Orders (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press), 1930, pp. 93–94
- Adler 2006. pp. 337–339.
- Cooper 2009b, p. 44.
- Adler 2006. p. 340.
- Adler 2006. p. 341.
- Clifton 2006. pp. 156–157.
- “AODA History”. Ancient Order of Druids in America. Retrieved 8 December 2015.
- Harvey 2007, p. 17.
- Trinity ARIS 2008; Trinity ARIS 2001Archived 25 June 2010 at the Wayback Machine
- Cooper 2009b, p. 45.
- Cooper 2009b, pp. 48, 49.
- Cooper 2009b, p. 48.
- Berger, Leagh & Shaffer 2003, p. 97.
- Berger, Leagh & Shaffer 2003, pp. 97–98.
- Berger, Leagh & Shaffer 2003, p. 100.
- Berger, Leagh & Shaffer 2003, p. 99.
- Hutton 2003, p. 258.
- Williams et al. 2012, p. 1065.
- Office for National Statistics, 11 December 2012, 2011 Census, Key Statistics for Local Authorities in England and Wales. Accessed 12 December 2012.
- “Druidry to be classed as religion by Charity Commission”. BBC News Online. 2 October 2010. Retrieved 2 October 2010.
- “The Druid Network – Decision made on 21 September 2010”(PDF). Charity Commission for England and Wales. 21 September 2010. Retrieved 2 October 2010.
- Williams et al. 2012, p. 1070.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia